On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 01:38:16 -0500, Bryan Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED]
posted to spamassassin-talk:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For many of these, one can observe that the user name in the From:
header often also occurs in the Subject line. This could be a useful
rule pattern, although there are
On 12 Dec 2003 08:45:08 +0200, I posted to spamassassin-talk:
:0fw
* ! ^From.*@([^ .]+\.)*rose-hulman\.edu\
| spamc -options ...
Oh, maybe the character class should also include comma and @ ... my
bad. FWIW, the first whitespace character is a space, and the second
is a tab.
/*
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:42:55 -0700, Dan Tappin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] posted to spamassassin-talk:
My hunch, which could be totally wrong, is that when parsing these
messages the multiple headers in the Outlook attached messages is
causing the problem.
Do you generally manage to process large
-Original Message-
From: Fred
Hello,
I am out the door on my way to work but we need a rule for a
new IE exploit just released, Visit this page, the exploit is
harmless but to the spoofer, it's man's best friend.
http://www.zapthedingbat.com/security/ex01/vun1.htm
I think
Just for curiosity (normally I just let autolearning happen without
interference from my meddling fingers), I tried to use sa-learn.
$ sa-learn --spam --mbox SPAM
Learned from 0 message(s) (15 message(s) examined).
$ sa-learn --ham --mbox mail/saved-messages
Learned from 0 message(s) (20
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 11:46 AM 12/11/2003, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
amavisd is running chroot'ed
/usr/local/libdata/perl5/site_perl/i386-openbsd/Net/DNS/RR/.pm
exists on the system.
But does it exist relative to the root of the chroot?
All Perl is at its usual place in the above
Hello List,
is there any possibility to change the digits of hit points from 1 (5.0) to
3 (5.000) that are shown in the report ? Since in the .cf files there are
3-digits hit points i would preffer to see them in the report, too...
any config-line i overlooked while seeing through the
I've seen several instanaces where the AWL mechanism has cause non-spam
email to be classed as spam. Here is example report from one of these:
Content analysis details: (50.7 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
I'm trying to do the mass-check corpus cleanup using the method in
CORPUS_SUBMIT file. My hard-sorted spams and hams are stored in MBOXs.
I'm assuming that the scripts: mass-check-results-to-mbox, mboxget, and
extract-message-from-mbox are used to help in this process to check and
purge
Friend gave this to me this morning:
uri CUSTOM_IE_URL_SPOOF
/\x01\s*\@|\#01\s*\@/
score CUSTOM_IE_URL_SPOOF (up to you, I set it
to 5.0)
describe CUSTOM_IE_URL_SPOOFCustom: URL tries to
spoof its identity via an IE trick
Anyone care to
RH9, amavisd-new (p6), spamassassin 2.6 :
I believe the config path that spamassassin is using is /usr/share/spamassassin.
However, I want it to use my chrooted amavis directory of /var/amavisd/usr/share/spamassassin.
How and where can I change this ?
Any help to this newbie is appreciated.
Peter McGarvey Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 8:46 AM
I've seen several instanaces where the AWL mechanism has cause non-spam
email to be classed as spam. Here is example report from one of these:
-4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
56 AWL
At 01:46 PM 12/12/03 +, Peter McGarvey wrote:
pts rule name description
-- --
-4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.]
56 AWL
The thing is that 'normal' large messages do not cause this. I have tested this. I
can't recreate the issue with a regular
message. I just sent a test message with a Word, PDF, AutoCAD drawing and an Excel
file - total 1 MB. Took about 2 to 3 seconds to
send.
These forwarded messages can
Set the -D and make sure it's reading the mbox right. I had a problem with
that. If it's running ok the spamassassin has already learned these mails.
It's smart enough not to learn the same or similar message more than once.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
At 01:58 PM 12/12/03 +0100, Kai Poppe/Redaktion SDCE wrote:
is there any possibility to change the digits of hit points from 1 (5.0) to
3 (5.000) that are shown in the report ? Since in the .cf files there are
3-digits hit points i would preffer to see them in the report, too...
any config-line i
Well the _REPORT_ version is terse, and usually used in headers, but I
thought the body report (_SUMARY_) had the full 3 digits.
Does yours not do this? What version?
Nope, mine does not. SpamAssassin 2.61 is the version.
## 10_main.cf:
clear_report_template
report_charset text/plain
[...]
All:
I just saw the strangest thing in my Yahoo! Mail bulk e-mail folder. It was
the usual collection of pornographic spams. But, there was one message that
really caught my eye. The subject line was:
*SPAM* The Beautiful Art of Female [snip]. xdvldmgzyohhmcn.
At 10:53 AM 12/12/2003, Kang , Joseph S. wrote:
===
Anyone know how this could have happened?
I'm just curious. I've NEVER seen Yahoo! tagged bulk email with SA tags.
Odds are the open relay that the spammers sent the mail through was running
Hi,
i have made few customs rules and i was playing around with them little
more and i was kinda curious if a rule like this will actually work, as
per my experiment i noticed that it is not working.
meta TTOFFICE_BLOCK (__TOOFFICE (!__FROMOFFICE ||
!__FROMRAIBLE))
describe
At 10:10 AM 12/12/2003, Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
I have found that AWL works quite well and I keep it enabled. The only time
that it is a pain is if I send myself or someone else a test using GTUBE.
That f's up the AWL until I send a few hams. There's a way to remove the
sender from the AWL but I
Oops. I sent my reply directly to Matt instead of the list...
-Joe
-Original Message-
From: Kang , Joseph S.
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 10:17 AM
To: 'Matt Kettler'
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Mysterious SA tags in SPAM message?
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm just curious. I've NEVER seen Yahoo! tagged bulk email
with SA tags.
Odds are the open relay that the spammers sent the mail
through was running SA.
Yes, you'd think anyone using SA would check for open relay,
but it does
happen.. I've gotten spam like this before.
Hmm... this
At 09:34 AM 12/12/2003, Smart,Dan wrote:
I'm assuming that the scripts: mass-check-results-to-mbox, mboxget, and
extract-message-from-mbox are used to help in this process to check and
purge improperly sorted mails out of the mbox. How are these used? Don't
see any docs anywhere, and nothing in
Matt Kettler Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 11:16 AM
At 10:10 AM 12/12/2003, Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
I have found that AWL works quite well and I keep it enabled. The only
time
that it is a pain is if I send myself or someone else a test using GTUBE.
That f's up the AWL until I send a few
At 11:12 AM 12/12/2003, Nayana Hettiarachchi wrote:
i have made few customs rules and i was playing around with them little
more and i was kinda curious if a rule like this will actually work, as
per my experiment i noticed that it is not working.
meta TTOFFICE_BLOCK (__TOOFFICE
I've tried everything I can think of to get the Evolution (1.4) mail
client to use SA (2.60) as a filter for spam mail but have come up MT.
The Evo FAQ states that Use Specific Headers and X-Spam-Flag (Yes)
will work but it doesn't. Neither does any other X-* header value of
the many I've tried.
Ah. That's what I was starting to think as I typed up my
original message.
I agree. It seems funny to do a check for SPAM and not do
any sort of check for open relay.
I'm no expert on Received headers, but:
Received: from 212.214.136.47 (EHLO smtp-fe2.ballou.se)
What exactly are you trying to do? I use Sendmail-Procmail-SA on my
mailserver (Mandrake 9.2). I access my email via IMAP using Evolution
1.4. I used the Evolution filters successfully for quite some time
until I started using SA. Now I have *no* rules in my Evolution
filters, and a simple
How can I see a spamassassin report of an email ? I'd like to do something
like pipe the email through a command.
With spamprobe I do spamprobe -T score, and it tells me everything it
thought about the email.
In my SA preferences I have:
rewrite_subject 0
report_safe 0
clear_headers
add_header
Hello. My first post here, so be gentle ;-)
I got Spamassassin 2.61 installed and it's working. Bayes is enabled, but
when I try to train it or do anything with sa-learn I get something like
this:
Use of uninitialized value in numeric lt () at
Thanks T,
Can you recommend a good site for building/customizing rule sets.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Terry Milnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 10:45 AM
To: Barb Bautista
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SA tests performed
Barb
What I want to do is skip an message that originates from our domain...
I have the following in the /etc/procmailrcfile:
:0:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
${DEFAULT}
# From system.rose-hulman.edu
:0:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
${DEFAULT}
#
This seems to work most of the time we when certain messages have
Hi,
Can any one tell me the procedure to configure spamassassin with
sendmail. I have sendmail 8.12.8 running, my case is a relay
server(HUB) with no local accounts. i have installed spamassassin which
runs as spamd. I want all the spam mails figured should be redirected to
one of the
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 01:35:09PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is rumored to have said:
How can I see a spamassassin report of an email ? I'd like to do something
like pipe the email through a command.
spamassassin -t email.txt
--
I've had a wonderful time, but this wasn't it.
- Groucho
Per,
| I'm having trouble with a newly installed server.
| OpenBSD 3.4 GENERIC#0 i386
| amavisd-new latest stable
| amavisd is running chroot'ed
|
| /usr/local/libdata/perl5/site_perl/i386-openbsd/Net/DNS/RR/.pm
| exists on the system.
| Not all mails will trigger the following error, I'm
hi all,
will shortly be installing SA 2.61.
i'd like to have a report sent to me with a breakdown of SA's activity,
either daily or weekly or whatever.
ideally, for it to list Sender, Recipient, Subject and Spam Score for all
mails that have been marked as Spam.
was thinking of writing a shell
Joop,
how come our SA 2.60 matches this subject-header:
Subject: Opetusteknologia-valmistelua
with SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID-rule?
The subject is perfectly legit finnish and doesn't seem that unique...
Thanks!
--
Mika Aleksandroff - IT Services, Kymenlaakso Polytechnic
I've been using SA for a little while now but am still not up to speed on
all it can do. We are mostly a Windows shop here so we have very few techs
who know Linux that well. We're using SPAMD to filter email and use a
Windows-based email proxy to send/receive info to/from the SPAMD host.
It
Hi all,
I recently moved from SpamAssassin 2.2 to 2.6 and I have an error which
has totally stumped me.
SpamAssassin is catching spam (see below) but every now and then I don't
actually get the original spam message, 60 % of the time I do, it's very
temperamental.
Eg:
Dec 11 14:34:44
I read through the readme and made a config change
to the way procmail and spamassassin work together, however I now get the
error:
couldn't create or rename temp file.
"/var/spool/mail/il -oi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a default /etc/procmailrc with the
lines
:0fw: spamassassin.lock
*
Hamilton, Kent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
com...
On your Linux box create three mail aliases (In sendmail syntax)
spamlearn:|/usr/local/bin/sa-learn --spam --norebuild
hamlearn: |/usr/local/bin/sa-learn --ham --norebuild
spamforget:
Hi all,
(Firstly, I'm not on this list, I'm only using it to log a bug.
can you please reply directly to me, Thanks)
I am seeing rather bad memory leak issue running spamd on Solaris 9
(sparc).
I have Exim + Exiscan MTA, this allows parsing the messages off to SA
for scanning,
it's been
Compiled list of domains that are known spammers and compiled list of various subject
lines used by spammers.
http://www.exit0.us/index.php/SpamDomainBlackList
or
http://www.spamfighter.org/bb/article.php?42.0
---
This SF.net email is
Stephen,
| RH9, amavisd-new (p6), spamassassin 2.6 :
|
| I believe the config path that spamassassin is using is
| /usr/share/spamassassin.
| However, I want it to use my chrooted amavis directory of
| /var/amavisd/usr/share/spamassassin.
|
| How and where can I change this ?
You need to
hi
spamassassin,
i have to write an essay about
spamassassin. my english is not very good. so is there a chance to get a german
translation of your website or some other information??
greetings
Thanks for the reference!
If anyone wants to use blackhole.securitysage.com in SpamAssassin,
here's how:
header BLACKHOLE_SSAGE eval:check_rbl_from_host('ssage',
'blackhole.securitysage.com')
describe BLACKHOLE_SSAGE Blacklisted as per
blackhole.securitysage.com
tflags
Hi.
503 is the userid of the spamd user.
Since the first header indicates the localhost, my guess is that the mail
was sent from the postfix machine itself, and not from another machine using
it as a relay.
Best regards.
Bruno Guerreiro
-Original Message-
From: Gary Funck [mailto:[EMAIL
--On Friday, December 12, 2003 1:35 PM -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I see a spamassassin report of an email ? I'd like to do
something like pipe the email through a command.
spamassassin filename1 filename2
filename1 is the input, filename2 is the output. Or alternately,
--On Friday, December 12, 2003 1:31 PM -0500 Rubin Bennett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I have *no* rules in my Evolution
filters, and a simple .procmailrc in my home directory that grabs all
the X-Spam-Status: Yes marked mails and dumps them into my Junk IMAP
folder.
After getting frustrated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Smart,Dan writes:
I'm trying to do the mass-check corpus cleanup using the method in
CORPUS_SUBMIT file. My hard-sorted spams and hams are stored in MBOXs.
I'm assuming that the scripts: mass-check-results-to-mbox, mboxget, and
from looking at the eval test that runs for that rule, it checks against
an English dictionary. Maybe you should disable the test
score SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID 0
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mika A
Sent: Friday, December 12,
At 10:50 AM 12/12/2003, Kai Poppe/Redaktion SDCE wrote:
Nope, mine does not. SpamAssassin 2.61 is the version.
Hmm, you're right..
It looks like that rounding behavior is hard-coded.. you'd have to modify
the source code to change it.
---
For those times that I'm on the road and not able to fire up Evolution
(bummer...), I use SquirrelMail on my server for webmail access. It's
fast, clean, and It Just Works(tm).
If you don't use Procmail on your IMAP server, it's VERY simple to add a
rule to Evo to grab messages with the
Barb Bautista said:
Thanks T,
Can you recommend a good site for building/customizing rule sets.
Thanks.
A good place to get started is www.exit0.us
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Barb Bautista
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SA tests performed
Thanks T,
Can you recommend a good site for building/customizing rule
I had a problem earlier where SA was hanging up incoming messages. the
spamd process would spawn but never finish till my box was 100% busy.
apparently the problem had to do with an upgrade of 2.44 to 2.60. I removed
the old whitelist and bayes files for all my users and spamd recreated them
On 12/12, Steve Thomas wrote:
spamassassin -t email.txt
On 12/12, Matt Kettler wrote:
pipe it through spamassassin -t
Note: -t mode FORCES sa to generate a report, and it WILL contain text
Works beautifully, thank you both. I swear I looked at the man page...
don't know how I missed
I get the justified part of your rule, but what about the rule references
HTML? I'd consider renaming your rule to JUSTIFIED_74_EQUAL or some such.
-Original Message-
From: Regis Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/internet/12/12/spam.charges/index.html
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything
Thanks for the insight.
When I run mass-check-results-to-mbox I get:
---
# sort -rn +1 ham.log | head -20 | ./mass-check-results-to-mbox
open /usr/local/src/confham.1173754 failed: at ./mass-check-results-to-mbox
line 125, line 1.
X-Mass-Check-Warning: open
No noticeable decrease in spam here...
did they get the right guys?
g
- Original Message -
From: Scott Rothgaber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:20 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] Virginia Busts Spammers
|
--On Friday, December 12, 2003 14:33:34 -0500 Greg Cirino - Cirelle
Enterprises [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No noticeable decrease in spam here...
did they get the right guys?
Yeah, but there are tons more to get :-(.
the Policy Enforcement Director where I work was glad to see them caught,
Here is a custom rule for a PayPal spoof virus that is going around. I can't get this
to trigger a hit in SA. I have linted my
rules and my config files are being loaded properly.
header PAYPAL_VIRUS_001 Subject =~ /YOUR PAYPAL\.COM ACCOUNT EXPIRES/i
describe PAYPAL_VIRUS_001 Wonderfull
the site says one can enter an e-mail address OR a domain name, but if I
enter a domain name (unchecking the Username and FullAddress checkboxes) it
complains:
: The input was not a valid email address as defined by RFC822. Please go
: back and enter an address which conforms to RFC822
I want to
Gentian, to help alleviate mail processing do also try
any of a number of RBLs out there. these tend to be IP-based so your
server will never actually receive mail.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
JRileySent: Wednesday, December 10,
Dan Tappin wrote:
Here is a custom rule for a PayPal spoof virus that is going around.
I missed that one, try this out, they work for all previous scams I've seen.
header __RCVD_PAYPAL Received =~ /paypal\.com/i
header __FROM_PAYPAL From =~ /paypal\.com/i
uri __URI_PAYPAL /paypal\.com/i
At 02:50 PM 12/12/2003, Dan Tappin wrote:
Here is a custom rule for a PayPal spoof virus that is going around. I
can't get this to trigger a hit in SA. I have linted my
rules and my config files are being loaded properly.
Which configfile did you add your rule to? local.cf or user_prefs?
Do
Hello there (I'm pretty newbiew on SA) and maybe my questions are stupid,
but any way,
1. When I run SA-Lear on HAM and SPAM confirmed directories (let's talk
about 800 mails on each one), but after that I still getting some SPAM that
aren't detected, If I wan to run SA-learn again, do I have to
I had a problem earlier where SA was hanging up incoming messages. the
spamd process would spawn but never finish till my box was 100% busy.
apparently the problem had to do with an upgrade of 2.44 to 2.60. I
removed
the old whitelist and bayes files for all my users and spamd recreated
The spamassassin manpage talks about setting up an alias to report spam,
piping the mail to spamassassin -r. Since this reports to DCC and Razor,
shouldn't one clean up the headers first? Isn't there risk of getting
your own domain name into the spam report? (Or at least into your own
Bayes
At 03:33 PM 12/12/2003, sabat wrote:
The spamassassin manpage talks about setting up an alias to report spam,
piping the mail to spamassassin -r. Since this reports to DCC and Razor,
shouldn't one clean up the headers first? Isn't there risk of getting your
own domain name into the spam report?
BigEvilList_170 catches vnunet.com. Is that appropriate?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the
In Evolution:
Tools-Filters-Add
If:
Specific Header X-Spam-Status is Yes
Then:
Move to Folder Junk
OK.
The search for the specific header is case sensitive... make sure you're
looking for hte right thing. Also, I assume that Evo will strip the
trailing : from the header, so no need to put it in
At 04:06 PM 12/12/2003, Ken Gordon wrote:
BigEvilList_170 catches vnunet.com. Is that appropriate?
Depends on what you consider appropriate..
bigevil is autogenerated from some piles of spam. As such, it's going to be
prone to FP cases.
Bounce a message to Chris S and ask him to double-check
Anybody have any suggestions??
--Keith
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Keith Olmstead wrote:
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 14:32:56 -0500 (EST)
From: Keith Olmstead [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] SA + Openldap problem
---
This
To any of you running SpamAssassin 2.60+ with SendMail and spamass-milter
0.2.0 I am curious as to whether the -notfirsthop rules (such as Dynablock)
are working correctly for you. (I'm aware of its move to SORBS) When
SpamAssassin processes email through spamass-milter it's rarely matching
Archive of this:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10613675441r=1w=2
Analyze letter frequency for normal words, and detect non-normal letter
frequency of gibberish.
--luke
I have noticed that many SPAM emails, end with seversl lines of gibberish,
such as:
lvwpdfobv qkviylqr qlmwacbc
Great news...
Any idea on how a rather nasty bug can be addressed before the next
release? I had hoped it would be addressed in 2.61 (I've been away
from the list for a while so I didn't see the pre-announcements). It
apparently is affecting a fair number of people aside from myself:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 12:33:26PM -0800, sabat wrote:
The spamassassin manpage talks about setting up an alias to report spam,
piping the mail to spamassassin -r. Since this reports to DCC and Razor,
shouldn't one clean up the headers first? Isn't there risk of getting
your own domain name
JV == Jonathan Vanasco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JV AOL IM
JV Maybe its an ichat only thing -- because everyone i know running iChat
JV gets 10+ AOL IM spams a day. I'm averaging 15.
zero for me, and I run iChat. none on my yahoo, either. i
occasionally get some troller randomly chatting
Hi Matt,
I created in a custom .cf file in /etc/mail/spamassassin
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt
Kettler
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Rule Help...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vivek Khera writes:
Great news...
Any idea on how a rather nasty bug can be addressed before the next
release? I had hoped it would be addressed in 2.61 (I've been away
from the list for a while so I didn't see the pre-announcements). It
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 14:30:09 -0800, Justin Mason wrote
[snip]
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2569
Missed that one; I've just set it to be fixed for 2.62. It seems pretty
complex; either there's several failure cases, or nobody has yet done
enough diagnosis to get to the
El dom, 30-11-2003 a las 01:28, Chris Thielen escribió:
Dr Aldo Medina said:
Using Debian Sarge with spamassassin-2.60-2 deb package and
procmail-3.22-7.
Even when it used to work, since a few weeks it seems like spamassassin
doesn't follow my local.cf rules. For example, even when I
Title: how it works
I have a fresh installation of SA, a default local.cf (attached) and nothing more. Now SA acts great on GTUBE test, but when I forward to my new SA protected account a spam message nothing happens.
Whats the trick?
pacho
If you see two spammers hang hopefully a 100 will stop or atleast move
off shore.
SCott
At 01:40 PM 12/12/2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Friday, December 12, 2003 14:33:34 -0500 Greg Cirino - Cirelle
Enterprises [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No noticeable decrease in spam here...
did they
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Vanecek writes:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 14:30:09 -0800, Justin Mason wrote
[snip]
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2569
Missed that one; I've just set it to be fixed for 2.62. It seems pretty
complex; either there's several
I've been experimenting with configuration of spamassassin for sitewide
use (in particular, using spamassassin 2.60 with sa-exim 3.1 and exim
4.30, under Solaris 8), and for the life of me, I can't seem to get
bayesian classification and autolearn working.
No matter what I do, my X-Spam-Status
At 06:33 PM 12/12/2003, pacho baratta wrote:
I have a fresh installation of SA, a default local.cf (attached) and
nothing more. Now SA acts great on GTUBE test, but when I forward to my
new SA protected account a spam message nothing happens.
What's the trick?
forwarded spam is not the same as
At 06:37 PM 12/12/2003, J. S. Greenfield wrote:
bayes_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes
bayes_file_mode 0666
where both the bayes_path directory, and the spamd home directory (it's
parent), are owned by spamd, and world writeable, at this point, for good
measure.
There's
Hi All
I have been running spamassassin for my .qmail for a while with excellent
success rate. But now I like to use it for a group alias
This is how I have it set up
# .qmail-group
| /usr/local/bin/spamassassin | forward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it a valid setup ? I did receive a test email
At 05:10 PM 12/12/2003, Dan Tappin wrote:
Hi Matt,
I created in a custom .cf file in /etc/mail/spamassassin
Dan
Hmm, then that should work correctly...
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or
Scott Williams , Area4 wrote:
If you see two spammers hang hopefully a 100 will stop or atleast move
off shore.
I was just thinking, I know spam is a big problem, and all that, but
reading the article, I don't know. I hate to sound schizophrenic, but I
mean, surely these guys are not
Scott Williams , Area4 wrote:
If you see two spammers hang hopefully a 100 will stop or atleast move
off shore.
I was just thinking, I know spam is a big problem, and all that, but
reading the article, I don't know. I hate to sound schizophrenic, but I
mean, surely these guys are not
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 14:37, Chr. von Stuckrad wrote:
Hi!
I just found a perfectly legitimate E-Mail
which neighter contained Spam-Text nor any html
in my Spambox, hit by two 'ofsucation checks'.
One I had generated with https://sandgnat.com/cmos/cmos.jsp
in response to the ever
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 13:22, Chris Thielen wrote:
Adam D. Lopresto said:
snip
My solution was to split the tokens into word/nonword classes and group
them. The characters in the word character class get the \b word
boundary
check, while the non-word character classes simply match
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 12:05, Chris Thielen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
snip
If I enter a single-character string in the easy mode text box, the
rules will somehow manage to drop the character from the obfuscated
rules. I.e. for the input d I get the regex /(?!\bd\b)\b/i (and not
the
Thanks. I installed BerkeleyDB, DB_File, and corrected bayes_path as
you indicated. No apparent change in behavior.
Any other thoughts?
Thanks,
Jonathan
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 06:37 PM 12/12/2003, J. S. Greenfield wrote:
bayes_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes
bayes_file_mode
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 19:44, Chris Thielen wrote:
I haven't updated the version history because exit0 appears to be down,
but the main link (http://sandgnat.com/cmos/cmos.pl) or the cgi
Er... I'm dumb. Make that http://sandgnat.com/cmos/obfu.pl
... sure wish this list thing had a cancel
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
