Hi,
i wrote a litle Perlscript. It counts detected Spam and Viruses from
amavis.log and creates a litle report about Spam by Sender Spam by
Recipient
If you are interested you can download it from:
http://homepages.hs-bremen.de/~renegat/amavislogsumm
regards
sascha
Title: Message
Hi
-
Apologies for what
is probably an awful newbie blunder, but...
I have
installedMailScanner with SpamAssassin (no spamd) on RedHat Linux, and now
I'm trying
to get some local rules going, so I edited /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf to
contain lines like the following:
Hello list !
I am kinda new here chaps, so please bare with me.
A simple question (which I didn't pose on the xmail forum in case I
get flamed/cursed) :-)
From what it seems, one must let spamassassin know of what to filter
as spam mail; So far so good.
It also looks like one has to invoke a
Hi all,
in the last view days I experienced some (for me) strange kind of spam.
The first part of the email is a random text (that's what I see in my email
client when opening the email):
snip
embedding rose abalone freedman havana bayport regretful menlo gate
blomquist
force parasitic
It would be nice if one could take into account a Spam probability also
based from the originating Received From: header lines. I.e. I would want to
have a whitelist of known good mail servers and assign them a negative score
test value and a have a blacklist which is assigned a positive score.
At 10.48 21/01/2004 +, ROGERS Richard wrote:
each time
re-starting MailScanner (and I believe by implication SpamAssassin, since
it runs as part of MailScanner rather than as a separate process) and
sendmail.
I'm sure I'm missing something obvious - but
what?
MailScanner uses it's own
* Jim Knuth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hallo und guten Tag Sascha,
danke für die Email, die Du am 21.01.2004 um 11:07 schriebst - you wrote:
Hi,
i wrote a litle Perlscript. It counts detected Spam and Viruses from
amavis.log and creates a litle report about Spam by Sender Spam by
Title: Message
That's
got it working - about as basic as I thought ;-)
Thanks
(or should I say grazie?)
Richard
-Original Message-From: Giovanni Carbone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 January 2004
11:24To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Re: [SAtalk] Local rules
Hi Jürgen!
you need some rules for SA which can detect obfuscated spellings of
those keywords like vagira, cilais a.s.o.
heres a sample rule i normally use for such words
body MY_OBF1
/((?!*censored*)(?:(?:[EMAIL PROTECTED]|@])|(?:v\W*[i|1]\W*[a|@]\W*g\W*r\W*[a|@])))/i
describe MY_OBF1 body:
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 18:28, Fred wrote:
I can not imagine what it would be like to work for an abuse dept. at
an internet company and receive hundreds or thousands of complaints
about customers computers being hijacked or turned into spam zombies.
Non-original joke:
I think that job is
At 04:33 PM 1/20/04 +0100, Ralf Vitasek wrote:
i tested many things with the trusted users settings and googled around
but i had no luck so far.
except that i stumbled on a posting from this lists archive that makes me
think that something is broken and that it would be fixed in the upcoming
Hi,
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:51:12 + Spyros Tsiolis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list !
I am kinda new here chaps, so please bare with me.
A simple question (which I didn't pose on the xmail forum in case I
get flamed/cursed) :-)
This list is usually civil, probably the most polite
At 11:56 AM 1/21/04 +0100, Jürgen R. Plasser wrote:
Is there any way to get rid (say: score 5) of those mails with SA? Some
rules?
I have SA 2.61 and the latest Bigevel rules installed.
Well, antidrug is a good start.
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/mkettler/sa/antidrug.cf
At 12:37 AM 1/21/04 -0500, Pedro Sam wrote:
My question, should
bayes ignore the habeas headers by default?
Perhaps not by default, but right now it's probably a good idea.
In general, any sudden shift of behavior from something commonly seen only
in nonspam to commonly seen in both causes
AltGrendel wrote:
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 18:28, Fred wrote:
I can not imagine what it would be like to work for an abuse dept. at
an internet company and receive hundreds or thousands of complaints
about customers computers being hijacked or turned into spam zombies.
Non-original joke:
I
At 10:41 PM 1/20/04 -0600, C. Bensend wrote:
Is the problem that I'm _forwarding_ the tagged emails from one host
to the other? I don't have the capability to bounce, I can only forward.
A forwarded message is a brand new message. That brand new message is NOT
sa tagged, even though it may
Sneaky bastard... got through with a 4.7
--
Rubin Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RB Technologies
---BeginMessage---
Page loading
Image not loading? View message here.Discontinue
iJadp0tVrCS/91fN6/XSvXW0yL/QI1S0R9f/xKf7i/oMe1w/
dlfx ytou, xjjk, biieve . cpsd aflrkw kmwdc, tcb, owf . ejujzy
rbhti
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
Hello list !
Hello.
I am kinda new here chaps, so please bare with me.
A simple question (which I didn't pose on the xmail forum in case I
get flamed/cursed) :-)
From what it seems, one must let spamassassin know of what to filter
as spam
This list is usually civil, probably the most polite of any of the
anti-spam lists I'm on. Don't suggest that SpamAssassin should delete
mail automatically and you'll be fine. :)
And don't top-post. :)
It also looks like one has to invoke a special format of expressions
(regex's?)
to
A forwarded message is a brand new message. That brand new message is NOT
sa tagged, even though it may contain some SA markups because the other
message was tagged.
Ah, that would certainly explain it. Thanks for the info, Matt. :)
I'll just have to figure out some other way of doing it,
Hello All,
Here is a question that might seem easy to most. I am running spamassassin 2.60 and
would like to
upgrade to 2.63. What are some of the issues that I have to be aware of? I am fairly
new to
spamassassin and I would like a seemless upgrade to ensure that I do not ruin the
current
Title: Spelling mistakes in spam
Hi,
We've been looking and trialling No Spam Today which is based upon spamassasin. When we first tried it, it was catching probably 99% of all spam. However, over the past three months this figure has decreased noticeably. It appears to be because spammers
-Original Message-
From: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 9:39 AM
To: AltGrendel; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] [OT] - The current state spam.
AltGrendel wrote:
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 18:28, Fred wrote:
I can not imagine
Looking at changing from Redhat 9.0 to new hardware and thought given the
redhat/fedora support/lifespam issues I'd look at Suse.. seems well
regarded, well supported and has newbie-friendly admin tools even in console
mode..
Any thoughts on the simplest way of installing spamassassin _and_
At 09:51 AM 1/21/2004, Nicholson, Rob wrote:
We've been looking and trialling No Spam Today which is based upon
spamassasin. When we first tried it, it was catching probably 99% of all
spam. However, over the past three months this figure has decreased
noticeably. It appears to be because
It's not strictly a spam measurement, but www.senderbase.org has excellent real-time
lists of outbound mail volume by ISP and IP address.
Pierre
-Original Message-
From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 10:08 AM
To: 'Fred'; AltGrendel;
-Original Message-
From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 10:08 AM
To: 'Fred'; AltGrendel; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] [OT] - The current state spam.
-Original Message-
From: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there an easy way of changing the BigEvil Scores without modifying
bigevil.cf which gets updated a lot? And without duplicating them into
local.cf.
-=B
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 14:23:44 -0600
Kang , Joseph S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The HABEAS_VIOLATOR test is nice for those sites that also have SA do
network tests. MINE DOESN'T.
For next runs of GA, maybe HABEAS rules should have four scores. So we
could have something like:
score HABEAS_SWE
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 09:33, Rubin Bennett wrote:
Sneaky bastard... got through with a 4.7
Chris:
Would you prefer that we email you this stuff offlist? I have a few too,
but I don't want to contribute to the line noise on this list.
--
AltGrendel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:46:38 -0500
Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want your server to be in german, tell it.
export LANG=de
note: this may affect other programs on the system that are language-smart
as well.
Yes, but you change this in the init script, e.g.
case $1 in
Hello,
I'm running spamassassin 2.62 with MailScanner on redhat 9. What I'm
trying to run is this:
sa-learn -p /etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf --spam --mbox
/var/spool/mail/bayes
But, it just sits there. Sa-learn --rebuild and --force-expire work
fine. When I first upgraded from 2.61
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 09:38, Brad Hazledine wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
Hello list !
Hello.
I am kinda new here chaps, so please bare with me.
A simple question (which I didn't pose on the xmail forum in case I
get flamed/cursed) :-)
From what it seems,
I have a RedHat 9.0 box that
I want to turn into a Spam Filtering Device.
Basically all that I want the RedHat box to do is:
1). take in the emails,
2). then filter them with Spam Assassin,
3). mark the subject lines as *** SPAM ***,
4). and finally pass all of the emails to my MS Exchange
Hello spam peeps
Well I was going to hold off posting this until I had the time to edit
the page explaining the Rule Sets, but I got a spam this morning, tagged
only by this updated Backhair Set. I was irked enough (thinking these
spams might be getting through on other machines) that I will go
Yes: http://www.exit0.us/index.php/RulesDuJourMungeScripts
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 09:16, Rose, Bobby wrote:
Is there an easy way of changing the BigEvil Scores without modifying
bigevil.cf which gets updated a lot? And without duplicating them into
local.cf.
-=B
http://postfix.cnc.bc.ca/twiki/bin/view/Main/SpamAssassinTaggingOnly is what
I use with Postfix to do pretty much the same thing. Very simple and it
works.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I get over 50 spam messages every day and a lot of valid mail, which is
usually whitelisted. I see, at most, one spam message that gets through every
2 or 3 weeks. Excellent job, SA team!
I train Bayes on all spam regularly and I want to use auto_learn to train
Bayes when the score is over 9.
Greetings
We're seeing lots of the =?iso in the header messages getting
through. We have this rule in place:
header SUBJECT_ENCODED_MY_TEST Subject:raw =~ /=\?.*\?=/i
describe SUBJECT_ENCODED_MY_TEST Subject begins with =?
scoreSUBJECT_ENCODED_MY_TEST 5.0
When I try to send a test
Not to flame anyone, but I sure do hope my isp never blocks ports. I
don't pay for obstructed internet access. I do run a small mail server
from my home dsl connection. I allow family members to use that to send
to/from. The local cable provider here (Brighthouse) just about blocks
all inbound
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Christian Nygaard wrote:
It would be nice if one could take into account a Spam probability
also based from the originating Received From: header lines. I.e. I
would want to have a whitelist of known good mail servers and assign
them a negative score test value and a have
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Robert Menschel wrote:
CS I'm not sure where the post is, but about 3 weeks ago I think Dallas
CS put a semi-end to the spell-checker debate :)
Perhaps I need to re-clarify. The idea is NOT to treat mis-spelled words
as spam. The idea is to find specific 'close matches' to
Try MailScanner. That's what we use. It works well for just relaying
mail onto an exchange server.
Spamassassin ties into it, and it's pretty easy to configure.
http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/
-Original Message-
From: Dustin O Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I believe you have neglected to hook SA into your mail delivery path.
There are a number of ways to do this; but the most straight forward is
to use procmail and add a .forward and a .procmailrc file into your home
directory.
Fernan Aguero wrote:
Hi,
I just installed SpamAssassin-2.6.1 under
OY! That set had the original testing scores. Fixed now. Sorry
Haste = Bad
said, if you use Backhair version 1.1 (just posted it) you no longer
http://www.emtinc.net/spamhammers.htm
Jenn/ifer -- 44 on new Backhair set ;) ...oooh the urge to say
it!
B..(cough cough) (cough cough
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=3.5 autolearn=no tests=HTML_20_30=0.474,
HTML_FONT_BIG=0.1,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,LOC_LOWPRICE=0.9,
LOC_WEIGHTPATCH=1,RCVD_IN_NJABL=0.1,RCVD_IN_SORBS=0.1
Example HTML below. SA seems to have not recognized the EE font as
At 10:55 AM 1/21/2004, Paul Diaguila wrote:
X-Spam-Score: 1.8
BAYES_30,HTML_60_70,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_02,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY,MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE,OACYS_CONS_6,RM_rb_ANCHOR,RM_rb_BODY,RM_rb_HTML,RM_sl_Parens,SUBJECT_ENCODED_MY_TEST
What am I missing?
What version of SA are you
Yeah, we have had this same conversation on another list a week ago. We are
saying by DEFAULT and ISP should block the ports, BUT it should be removed
if asked, and FREE of charge. I'm sure the percentage of users who would
request it would be like 5%. THen it would be easy to monitor traffic (not
+[ Eric W. Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] (21.Jan.2004 13:04):
|
| I believe you have neglected to hook SA into your mail delivery path.
| There are a number of ways to do this; but the most straight forward is
| to use procmail and add a .forward and a .procmailrc file into your home
| directory.
Can someone tell me how to look for no To or CC field in the header.
I get several emails sent to me like this and would like to score them.
Best I could come up with is
ToCc !~ /To|cc/i
Can someone tell me how Im suppose to do this.
Regards
Steve
One of the speakers at Spamcon 2004, talked about the effectiveness of
automatically generated white lists. As I recall, his scheme depended upon
two sources of info: the mail addresses that typically appeared in your
To: From: and Cc: lines in your corpus of ham, during training and
At 10:36 AM 1/21/2004, Jody Cleveland wrote:
I'm running spamassassin 2.62 with MailScanner on redhat 9. What I'm
trying to run is this:
sa-learn -p /etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf --spam --mbox
/var/spool/mail/bayes
But, it just sits there. Sa-learn --rebuild and --force-expire work
I made this point on a mimedefang list. Some people didn't really like it.
Computers are too complicated for people to be responsible some said.
So I tried equating it to maintaining your car in that, if your car smokes
and causes pollution - it is NOT the manufacturers responsibility to come
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 15:40, Jennifer Wheeler wrote:
I will update the page when I get some free time in the hopes of making
this change more clear. I left Popcorn on there for now, but like I
said, if you use Backhair version 1.1 (just posted it) you no longer
(sniff sniff...) need
Fred Bennett wrote:
I have SA 2.61 running spamd on a Mandrake server with Postfix. It
sends mail to our Exchange 2000 server on the LAN. All is ok, except
for one user that wants to opt-out. This user wants to get all
messages unmodified by SA (I think header mods would be acceptable as
Your email made it into my spam folder. Mostly due to my very strict rules
(courtesy of my friend Chris):
[mail:root]# cat /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
body RANDOM_WORD_10
/(?:\b(?!(?:from|even|more|that|this|were|with)\b)[a-z]{4,12}\s+){10}/
describe RANDOM_WORD_10 string of 10+ random
Gary Funck wrote:
[snip]
Separate question (may be a faq): is there a database (SQL, etc)
implementation of from/received white lists? This would make updating
a whitelist easier, and more efficient than hacking the user_prefs
file, for example.
Yes, all the of the whitelist/blacklist
For some reason this doesn't work for me. I get all kinds of problems when I
run spamassassin -D --lint. I don't think it's a problem with the rule set,
because it happens on the tripwire rule set also. Any ideas or pointers? I
know this is very vague, so if anyone needs more information from me
I agree,
However, I don't see isp's not charging for access to blocked
ports. As is now, my current isp has hardware firewalls built into their
modems (along with dhcp etc.) and you can change the config (via
webbrowser) if you know what you are doing. I'm saying these kinds of
devices
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 22:11, Jay Levitt wrote:
One problem: If a spamassassin --lint fails (because if you, oh, had
outdated directives in your sa-mimedefang.cf file), then once you correct
that, on the next run, rules_du_jour won't update anything, because it
thinks everything is up to date.
aaap :)
Just send them to me offlist. However FP reports you might want to copy
here. As I remove them from the NEXT update. But people might want to remove
them right away. They still trickle in now and then.
--Chris (bored today for some reason)
-Original Message-
I agree and disagree :)
How many times have you heard this:
I don't understand, I have antivirus software.
When was the last time you updated it?
Update?
:-)
I know tons of people with broadband connections that might be on only a few
times a week. Some don't even notice their cpu is
For some reason this doesn't work for me. I get all kinds of problems
when
I
run spamassassin -D --lint. I don't think it's a problem with the rule
set,
because it happens on the tripwire rule set also. Any ideas or
pointers? I
know this is very vague, so if anyone needs more information
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:spamassassin-talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Santerre
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 11:27 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] [OT] - The current state spam.
Yeah, we have had this
Here is the error. When I copy and paste into emacs it's showing that the
lines didn't wrap.
pop3:/etc/spamassassin# spamassassin --lint
Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping: descrfull
J_BACKHAIR_33
- Original Message -
From: Chris Thielen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jay Levitt [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 3:01 AM
Subject: Re: [WL] [SAtalk] Yikes.. rules_du_jour
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 22:11, Jay Levitt wrote:
One problem: If a spamassassin --lint
Please excuse me if this is obvious, but I have tried to RTFM and I can't
figure out why I'm still seeing no SA info in my headers (no indication that
SA is doing anything). My ISP installed SA 2.60 on a RedHat 7.0 box. Using
Webmin, I can see the module installed and I see Spamassassin in the
Sorta what I was getting to.
Auto mechanics fix cars.
PC-Techs (pretty good lot of them - some even unemployed) out there fix
computers.
I just think people should accept that they need to pay a pc-tech to come in
once every few months to look their system over.
Just like they need to take
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Gary Funck wrote:
One of the speakers at Spamcon 2004, talked about the effectiveness of
automatically generated white lists. As I recall, his scheme depended upon
two sources of info: the mail addresses that typically appeared in your
To: From: and Cc: lines in your
Title: Export spam from Outlook in order to run sa-learn
Anyone got any idea how to export spam messages from Outlook 2000 that spamassassin is missing in order to run sa-learn?
Thanks, Rob.
This is the same setup that I use with a Mandrake mail server and it works
pretty well. We use Exchange on a SBS setup with the POP3 connector, but I'm in
the process of changing that to use SMTP delivery. Documentation for SA could
really be improved; I see the same questions being asked
Thanks for your very helpful answers.
Jürgen
--On 21.01.2004 11:56 +0100 Jürgen R. Plasser wrote:
Hi all,
in the last view days I experienced some (for me) strange kind of spam.
The first part of the email is a random text (that's what I see in my
email client when opening the email):
...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:spamassassin-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Crowe
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 12:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Popcorn Backhair have been combined into 1 Set
Here is the error. When I copy and
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 11:43, Keith Dowell wrote:
I made this point on a mimedefang list. Some people didn't really like it.
And I made almost the exact same point here recently...
Computers are too complicated for people to be responsible some said.
IMHO, if it's too complicated, you
this change more clear. I left Popcorn on there for now, but like I
said, if you use Backhair version 1.1 (just posted it) you no longer
(sniff sniff...) need Popcorn...
So if I grab Jennifer's backhair I don't need any popcorn? There must
be some hidden meaning there.
As hairy as my
Thanks, that is better, but I am still showing a parse error on
j_backhair_37.
Thanks for your patience. :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jennifer
Wheeler
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 11:37 AM
To: 'Jason Crowe'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Okay, I think I found out what went wrong. I think emacs is doing something
to the file when I paste the rule set into it.
Sorry and thanks,
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason
Crowe
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 11:47 AM
To:
OK, downloaded the source rpm and (i think) sucessfully built it into the pm
files, however I'm getting the following when installing:
perl(Pod::Usage) is needed by perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.62-1
perl(HTML::Parser) is needed by perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.62-1
I've done a little
Well, your rule is pretty wildly off.. ToCc is going to look for a header
named ToCc, not To headers and/or CC headers.
header __TO_EXISTS exists:to
header __CC_EXISTS exists:cc
meta NO_TO_OR_NO_CC (!__TO_EXISTS || !__CC_EXISTS)
Or perhaps you want
meta
Thanks for the help.
You see I thought that ToCc was valid. I thought I had read that somewhere. Obviously
Im wrong.
Thank you.
--
- Original Message -
DATE: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 12:58:36
From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Well,
At 01:02 PM 1/21/2004, st semps wrote:
You see I thought that ToCc was valid. I thought I had read that
somewhere. Obviously Im wrong.
Actually, it apparently is valid.. my bad..
However, the string returned won't contain the To: or Cc: parts, just the
email addresses.
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 12:57:55 +0100, Ralf Vitasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Jürgen!
you need some rules for SA which can detect obfuscated spellings of
those keywords like vagira, cilais a.s.o.
heres a sample rule i normally use for such words
body MY_OBF1
Title: Message
I
use an IMAP account. Move the message to an IMAP folder, then you have access to
the source of the real message.
Alternatively, I have used a product called "SpamSource" in the
past that will copy the source of the message to the clipboard. Then you can
paste it into notepad
I'm just got 2 of these. I'm not sure if the product is legit, but it does
look like it is. It was sent from yourdeals47.com. Which screams spam, and
is listed in a few RBLs. I'm thinking we will start seeing a lot more spam
with Taxes in it now.
If this product is legit and not a scam, then why
On 21 Jan 2004 12:13:40 -0600, Scott A Crosby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 12:57:55 +0100, Ralf Vitasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Jürgen!
you need some rules for SA which can detect obfuscated spellings of
those keywords like vagira, cilais a.s.o.
heres a
Hi Chris,
Small change for RulesDuJour: when sa is not in path lint will not succeed
(line 313). Maybe you could add a variable that contains the path to sa in
the settings?
Erik
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
I'd suggest turning on debug output with the -D parameter,
and see where it
gets stuck.
Here's what I get:
debug: Syncing Bayes journal and expiring old tokens...
debug: lock: 21404 created
/etc/MailScanner/bayes/bayes.lock.mystique.winnefox.org.21404
debug: lock: 21404 trying to get lock
I'm not sure I'd do this. One day (for a bunch of reasons) I whitelisted
my own address, and promptly got a bunch of spam from myself.
Good point, but all local addresses can (and must) be verified based upon
the incoming gateway's Received: header.
SpamAssassin 2.63 SRPM:
http://rpms.alerque.com/SRPMS/spamassassin-2.63-1.src.rpm
SpamAssassin 2.63 RPMS compiled for PLD i686:
http://rpms.alerque.com/RPMS/
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open
Correction: the rm should rm bayes.lock, not bayes_*.lock. My typo.
At 01:41 PM 1/21/2004, Jody Cleveland wrote:
Here's what I get:
debug: Syncing Bayes journal and expiring old tokens...
debug: lock: 21404 created
/etc/MailScanner/bayes/bayes.lock.mystique.winnefox.org.21404
debug: lock: 21404
At 01:41 PM 1/21/2004, Jody Cleveland wrote:
Here's what I get:
debug: Syncing Bayes journal and expiring old tokens...
debug: lock: 21404 created
/etc/MailScanner/bayes/bayes.lock.mystique.winnefox.org.21404
debug: lock: 21404 trying to get lock on /etc/MailScanner/bayes/bayes
with 0 retries
The
I have had Spamassassin running for long enough to have BAYES kick in.
I realized the other day when I checked out all my rulesets with
spamassassin -D --lint, I was getting a BAYES_0 test result. I never
saw such a thing from my email. I figured out that I needed to
specifically run spamc
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 18:23, Erik Slooff wrote:
Hi Chris,
Small change for RulesDuJour: when sa is not in path lint will not succeed
(line 313). Maybe you could add a variable that contains the path to sa in
the settings?
Erik
Will do. Should have it up tomorrow, along with some
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 12:13:26PM -0500, Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know tons of people with broadband connections that might be on only a few
times a week. Some don't even notice their cpu is slower. I also know some
pretty intelligent people that despite what they try, still
Hello,
I'm running spamassassin 2.62 with MailScanner on redhat 9. What I'm
trying to run is this:
sa-learn -p /etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf --spam --mbox
/var/spool/mail/bayes
But, it just sits there. Sa-learn --rebuild and --force-expire work
fine. When I first upgraded from 2.61
I'm running SpamAssassin using spamd, and invoking on my own system
through an entry in procmailrc. SpamAssassin runs fine and does indeed
properly filter out a lot of spam.
Yesterday, I added a number of rules to $HOME/.spamassassin/user_prefs.
I ran /home/alayne/sausr/bin/spamassassin -D
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:48:30 -0500
Ben Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have had Spamassassin running for long enough to have BAYES kick in.
I realized the other day when I checked out all my rulesets with
spamassassin -D --lint, I was getting a BAYES_0 test result. I never
saw such a
Thanks! That took care of it.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 12:50 PM
To: Jody Cleveland; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Not able to run sa-learn
Correction: the rm should rm bayes.lock, not
Thanks to Sylvain, Doug K. Chris P. for their ideas on improving the rules!
Changes:
Added some more entries (many more to come within the next few days, just
need time to process them)
Changed (\s|-|\.) in phone numbers to \W+, file should require less
memory to run, is easier to read and
Chris Thielen wrote:
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 18:23, Erik Slooff wrote:
Hi Chris,
Small change for RulesDuJour: when sa is not in path lint will not succeed
(line 313). Maybe you could add a variable that contains the path to sa in
the settings?
Erik
Will do. Should have it up tomorrow,
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
