Re: [SAtalk] list of test gone

2003-10-21 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Cliff Browning wrote, Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:39 PM I went to the spamassassin.org site today and the list of tests is not there. Could you please put it back. It's still at http://www.spamassassin.org/tests.html - easily reachable via the `Tests' link about half-way through the set of

Re: [SAtalk] Re: The Verisign folly

2003-09-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Giles Coochey wrote, Wednesday, September 17, 2003 10:50 AM Don't do that! Why not? gate# host sitefinder.verisign.com sitefinder.verisign.com has address 12.158.80.10 That's rather irrelevant - 64.94.110.11 never was the address of sitefinder. It is, however, the IP returned by the

Re: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_ORBS

2003-09-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 18:43, Gary Carr wrote: SA is flagging 100% of the incoming email with the RCVD_IN_ORBS score. Even mail from our internal network. None of the ip addresses are listed in [...] Has the orbs.dorkslayers.com gone the way of Osirusoft? dorkslayers has been dead as a doornail

Re: [SAtalk] has orbs.dorkslayers been removed from spamass 2.6?

2003-09-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 17:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With all the talk about Osirusoft, I didn't even know that orbs was dead! Dorkslayers died a death some months ago, after the nameservers were hit by over 6500 machines in 17 seconds in May, each making multiple queries (and that was the

Re: [SAtalk] Has anyone written rules for Sobig:F

2003-09-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 17:54, Kristian Koehntopp wrote: On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 04:36:02PM -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote: that I can just add? The point is moot. Sobig.F expired on 10-Sep-2003, due to an internal timebomb. The timebomb appears to be somewhat of a damp squib. Our mail server

Re: Debian stable backport (was: [SAtalk] Trademark improperly used in deceptive ad?)

2003-08-28 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Bob Proulx wrote, Thursday, August 28, 2003 7:13 AM Chuck Peters wrote: I was having a minor problem with spamassassin 2.53 (OSIRUSOFT) and decided to do a search for backports of Debian stable (Google spamassassin site:people.debian.org) ... I assume you found Duncan's backport area?

Re: [SAtalk] OSIRUSOFT -- should they be used any more?

2003-08-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 22:33, James Miller wrote: With all the trouble OSIRUSOFT is having, is it time to stop using them? [...] And to add to it, they are (have been since Friday) under a DDoS attack, their web site is down, mail is not flowing to them (because of the attack I assume) It's

RE: [SAtalk] OSIRUSOFT -- should they be used any more?

2003-08-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 23:32, Yackley, Matt wrote: I noticed this as well, after having long, long lookup times for the past couple of days, it started claiming just about every IP that connected to us was on the list. It really seems to have gone belly up or someone just set it to respond as

Re: [SAtalk] Filename Analysis for Malware Detection inSpam-Assassin

2003-08-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 18:10, Roland Lieger wrote: Slightly off-topic, but if you're going to propose blocking extensions for a particular reason, at least make sure that the reason is correct. :-) [...] Valid extensions for Windows programs files (that should be found) are: .vbs, .vbe,

Re: [SAtalk] HELP

2003-08-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 21:54, Matt Kettler wrote: Do you have a specific kind of help you need, or should we assume it's an accidental PEBAC? PEBKAC (or PEBCAK), surely? :-) The problem needs to exist between the chair and something else... Adam