Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.63 is released!

2004-01-21 Thread Bill Randle
-1mdk.src.rpm -Bill Randle [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http

Re: [SAtalk] bigevil location

2004-01-19 Thread Bill Randle
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 19:49, Fritz Mesedilla wrote: > > Hello folks! > I wanted to update my bigevil list but when I did a locate on them I got this: > > /var/amavis/.spamassassin/bigevil.cf > /etc/mail/spamassassin/bigevil.cf > > Now I really forgot where the correct location is. Both files are

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.62 is released!

2004-01-18 Thread Bill Randle
rg/spamassassin-2.62-1mdk.src.rpm md5sum: 65d95956ead44c0f92e76700eb55c924 perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.62-1mdk.i586.rpm 2174632461453879253930e7190e3909 spamassassin-2.62-1mdk.i586.rpm 9e42f0f61608142167258060fb9ea44b spamassassin-tools-2.62-1mdk.i586.rpm dd58ed97ef5e35929ede17d9a08b6a79 spamassassin-2.62-1mdk.src.rpm

Re: [SAtalk] Exchange and autolearn

2004-01-13 Thread Bill Randle
Dan wrote: Hi guys! I have a email gateway running spamassassin, amavisd-new and postfix. I am blocking a good chunk of spam. However, I am trying to figure out a good way to get the users involved in creating our own "blacklist" (I work for a private company, not a ISP) The mail gateway sits in

Re: [SAtalk] amavisd-new & spamassassin = no headers. Ugh!

2003-12-07 Thread Bill Randle
On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 20:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Greetings all! > > Detailed thread is here: > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=93771&start=0&sid=5b9753497d3d65e947679654382eea37 > > Basically, I have installed amavisd-new and SpamAssassin 2.60 on a box > that serves as a gateway

Re: [SAtalk] using SA w/ Rav (antivirus)

2003-06-09 Thread Bill Randle
MIMEDefang which in turn runs SA. I haven't had any real problems with this configuration. -Bill Randle SysAdmin OutlawNet, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chris Barnes wrote: We run Rav Antivirus on our mail servers (love it). It has an anti-spam feature, but it's

Re: [SAtalk] problem when compiling spamc

2002-07-01 Thread Bill Randle
The problem is spamd/spamc.c uses a rather funky test to determine if in_addr_t is defined in a standard system include file, or if the program should define in_addr_t itself. The test combines a test for the OS type and a check for EX__MAX being defined. The test is broken for some versions of O

[SAtalk] Patches for Digital Unix (OSF/1)

2002-06-15 Thread Bill Randle
_read() and full_write() in spamd/spamc.c are, of course, optional but do eliminate a screen-full of compiler warnings. -Bill Randle Neo Software Specialties, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Makefile.PL.orig Fri Jun 14 10:19:06 2002 --- Makefile.PL Sat Jun 15 14:41:42