Going forward, would it be possible to have a configuration option that
allows you to take Bayes scores into account when autolearning?
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 12:49 AM
To: Larry Rosenman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Did anyone ever figure out a fix for this on Exchange 2000? It will be
a while before I can migrate to 2003.
Thanks,
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Covington, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 12:39 PM
To: Bingham, Ryan; Tom Meunier; Martin Bene
Cc
I can't believe we're even debating this!
As my old boss would say, anyone who has enough free time on their hands
to worry about this kind of stuff needs a project!
I for one don't care what it's called. I'm more focused on keeping it
out of my users' mailboxes.
Ryan
-Original Message---
Check the first two lines of the header:
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from router ([192.168.1.8])
It looks like it was able to spoof amazon.com, which would explain why
it got whitelisted. If I'm reading this correctly, the first hop was to
an internal router (probably with its own
Mark,
This sounds great; thanks for posting the script. One question: does
this method preserve the message headers? I've had a lot of problems
keeping the headers intact with Exchange 2000/Public Folders/IMAP.
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Mark Motley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Open-source strikes back:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,1123172,00.asp
Let's hope there's some merit to this.
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Kristian Koehntopp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] LDAP Storage
I think there maybe be problems with the public folder solution in Exchange 2000.
While it appears to work under Exchange 5.5, in Exchange 2000 it seems that all mail
stored in public folders and accessed through IMAP or POP loses a lot of its header
information, at least in my experience. I
