Doug
****
* Doug Crompton *
* Richboro, PA 18954 *
* 215-431-6307*
* *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* http://www.crompto
When I run the spamd/c combo it works but I get a message in the log that
spamd is running as root, can't determine who the client is, and is
falling back to nobody.
I am a single user. All mail is processed to one account - procmail in the
.forward there,it runs spamc and then processses the mai
I just picked up Razor SDK 2.03 and 2.14 agents from the the razor site.
I am using SuSe 7.3 - intalled SDK with no problems. All tests passed.
When I try to make the 2.14 agents I get all kinds of errors. In
particuliar it says the net::dns is missing. But it seems to be there. The
SDK test pas
Well I got my first XXX that made it through SA today. They are getting
very clever. Seems fairly easy to catch though. Any punctuation in a
verbotten word should also be canned.
Doug
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 04:36:56 -0500 (CDT)
From: Karen <[EMAIL PROTECT
I take it this is corrected in CVS. Is it just a typo? Can I just correct
it? Take the source for this module from CVS?
Doug
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Bryan Hoover wrote:
> Doug Crompton wrote:
>
> > SA has been running great here for 2 months. I am very happy with it's
> &
15 IN.plug
332794 19576 17 IN.spam
Doug
* Doug Crompton *
* Richboro, PA 18954 *
* 215-431-6307*
* *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* http://www.crom
What is this nonsense? They added headers to track abuse? This is abuse!
Doug
-- Forwarded message --
Received: from host5-server.com ([66.78.20.220])
by marconi.crompton.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id g4EAoXG12000
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 May 2002 06:
.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id g4BEhLM26893;
Sat, 11 May 2002 10:43:21 -0400
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 10:43:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: Doug Crompton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: Spam Assassin List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: *SPAM* A special humour game (fwd)
> --
> derek
>
Explain that? This user just calls earthlink. They have no knowledge of
anything else.
Doug
****
* Doug Crompton *
* Richboro, PA 18954 *
* 215-431-6307*
* *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Doug
* Doug Crompton *
* Richboro, PA 18954 *
* 215-431-6307*
* *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* http://www.crompton.com
ing is, that while a number of messages are getting caught by the
> LARGE_HEX test, the score is being set to the default, rather than 5.
>
I don't know. I changed mine in the 50_scores file. It obviously works
there.
Doug
* Doug Crompton *
*
to 5 or so and I have
no problem. I never get data in the body of a meesage and this has not
caused me any false negatives so far.
Doug
****
* Doug Crompton *
* Richboro, PA 18954 *
* 215-431-6307*
* *
* [EMAIL PROT
This is really spam - should we not have something that matches credit
card debt? Submitted to razor.
Doug
-- Forwarded message --
Received: from outmta027.topica.com (outmta027.topica.com [64.125.140.180])
by marconi.crompton.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) with SMTP id g43EeoG0797
Thought you might like to read about the latest scam mail...
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Scam Warning! Please read.
Dear Valued Go Daddy customer,
Tuesday morning, alert Go Daddy customers notified me that another
scammer is after your personal information. Our legal team is already
worki
uot;foff_fam") 16KB. ]
[ Unable to print this part. ]
---
****
* Doug Crompton *
* Richboro, PA 18954 *
* 215-431-6307*
* *
* [EMAIL PROTEC
get phione
solicitations from overseas because of the cost. If you did then that
would be just as bad. Of course with the phone system blocking of entire
areas is much more pratical.
Doug
* Doug Crompton *
* Richboro, PA 18954 *
* 215-431-6307
o not score - like dialup?
Doug
****
* Doug Crompton *
* Richboro, PA 18954 *
* 215-431-6307*
* *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* [EMAIL PROTECT
would say if no one gets
it then no one would respond but those that don't care about filtering
spam are the ones that would respond. Can we forward this junk to our US
representitives or somewhere else where it is noticed?
Doug
**
uu507147
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 16:03:56 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <000b01c1eae8$6950cda0$2c7287ac@lindadalyasid>
From: "Linda Daly ASID" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Doug Crompton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: *SPAM* NTHS March
e answer. And it does work.
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 22 17:01:51 2002
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 22:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Craig R Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Doug Crompton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Spam Assassin List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sub
cmail to use '/usr/bin/perl
> /usr/bin/SpamAssassin/spamassassin' instead of just calling
> spamassassin.
>
> --
> Jason Kohles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Senior System Architect
> Red Hat Professional Consulting http
1 had been working fine
before install except for razor issue.
Doug
****
* Doug Crompton *
* Richboro, PA 18954 *
* 215-431-6307*
* *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Version: SpamAssassin 2.11 (devel $Id: SpamAssassin.pm,
v 1.68 2002/03/04 01:22:24 hughescr Exp $)
X-Spam-Prev-Content-Type: text/html;
* Doug Crompton *
* Richboro, PA 18954 *
* 215-431-6307*
* *
* [EMAIL
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Upgrade SA to 2.20 or downgrade Razor to 1.19
>
Ok I did and the problem went away. BUT my spamassassin headers still
say 2.11 Is it possible this was not changed? I am definitely using the
2.20 stuff.
Doug
****
*
resolution to this yet?
Doug
* Doug Crompton *
* Richboro, PA 18954 *
* 215-431-6307*
* *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* http://www.crompton.com
25 matches
Mail list logo
