Hi Jennifer,
When running lint on the latest chickenpox (1.11) I get this error:
donkeykong:/etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour # /usr/local/bin/spamassassin
--lint
Failed to compile body SpamAssassin tests, skipping:
(Unmatched ( in regex; marked by -- HERE in
January 2004 07:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Rules Du Jour v 1.07b
Here is a consolidated reply to a bunch of Rules Du Jour messages:
btw, version 1.07b is released.
From:
Erik Slooff
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Chris,
Small change for RulesDuJour: when sa is not in path lint will not succeed
(line 313). Maybe you could add a variable that contains the path to sa in
the settings?
Erik
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Hi all,
I get the following errors from spamd (tons of them in my logfiles) and I
have no idea how to fix this. Ditching my bayes_* files isn't an option as
it takes several hours to regenerate them (I have a spam corpus of about
2 which I collected over a period of 10 months...). Sa-learn
Hi all,
I get the following errors from spamd (tons of them in my logfiles) and I
have no idea how to fix this. Ditching my bayes_* files isn't a good option
as it takes several hours to regenerate them (I have a spam corpus of about
2 which I collected over a period of 7 months...). Sa-learn
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
MIKE YRABEDRA
Verzonden: maandag 17 november 2003 17:37
Aan: SPAMASSASSIN
Onderwerp: Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade or Stay?
on 11/17/03 10:13 AM, Todd Schuldt at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SA 2.6 with
You need to pass the logfile name of your mail-daemon, e.g.
./spamstats0.4b5.pl /var/log/mail
I use spamd, and it works.
Markus
you have an link for this script? Thank you.
First hit after googling for spamstats and perl:
http://freshmeat.net/projects/spamstats/?topic_id=245
Bye,
It may be because it is a legitimatly constructed email, and not one
sent from a mass mailer program or anything like that.
Or maybe the email message is legitimate and you were the only recipient...
and she really needs your help! ;-)
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 23:19, Simon Byrnand wrote:
Hi
Hi,
Anybody know what this error means?
__db_assert: 0 failed: file ../dist/../common/db_err.c, line 200
/home/erik/.spamassassin/sa-learn-cron: line 24: 20282 Aborted
It showed up when running a cron script that calls sa-learn.
Thx,
Erik
If you fancy testing a pre-release of SpamAssassin 2.60, one is now
available:
I currently have a running SA 2.60-cvs setup (from 220603) with which I
had no probs running make test. However, with SA 2.60-PR1 I have the
following errors running make test:
t/spamd_report_ifspam...ok 1/10
Thx, indeed the code runs fine as far as I can tell for now.
Erik Slooff writes:
If you fancy testing a pre-release of SpamAssassin 2.60, one is now
available:
I currently have a running SA 2.60-cvs setup (from 220603)
with which I
had no probs running make test. However, with SA
I received an email with the attached header and 2.55 scored a 0.0,
absolutely no
tests were triggered. 2.43 on the other hand scored it as a 1.8. I
was kinda
surprised that it didn't trigger anything in 2.55. Can somebody else
run it through
and tell me what you got. Maybe there is
Hi Jim,
For example when issuing the following command from the SA source dir
(where the sample spam message is):
# spamassassin -D sample-spam.txt out.tx
I get (among a lot of other output) the following lines indicating
Net::DNS is working
debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
debug:
Being the joker that was the cause of this thread I can only support
the response of others that such a reaction to a posting in *this* list
amazes me a bit. Just wanted to share as much info as necessary and that
obviously will sometimes create false negatives My mail was not
meant to
14 matches
Mail list logo
