[SAtalk] Re: spamd & qmail, round 2...

2003-10-01 Thread Klaus Alexander Seistrup
On Roger Merchberger wrote: > 1) Is anyone else running spamd from tcpserver? I've been running spamd under dæmontools/supervise with a run file similar to yours for months -- works like a charm. (You did mean supervise rather than tcpserver, didn't you?) // Klaus -- ><>o mordo tua nu

[SAtalk] Re: Restart Spamd

2003-09-30 Thread Klaus Alexander Seistrup
Dallas L. Engelken wrote: > no point in restarting just for a change in local.cf. just send > it a SIGHUP. running through daemontools makes it easy... > > # svc -t /service/spamd The -t switch tells the sueprvise process to send a SIGTERM to said service, while -h means SIGHUP. Cheers, //

[SAtalk] Re: procmail error

2003-09-28 Thread Klaus Alexander Seistrup
Asif Iqbal wrote: >:0: > * ^Subject:.*\*\*\*\*SPAM\*\*\*\* >|/usr/bin/mailx [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I am seeing this error in the procmail log file > > --> procmail: Couldn't determine implicit lockfile from > "/usr/bin/mailx" A lock is not necessary for a filter, try #v+ :0 * ^Subject:.*\*\*\*