stname;
}
and run from the command line:
neptune# perl -e 'use Sys::Hostname; print Sys::Hostname::hostname() . "\n";'
neptune.hub.org
So looks fine to me ...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 07:24:57PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > Pyzor -> check failed: Insecure $ENV{PATH} while running with -T switch at
> > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 870.
>
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003, Chris wrote:
> > Then you'll want to change your procmail file to call spamc instead of
> > spamassassin. (It's faster to include the full path to spamc by the way)
>
> OK, so by calling spamc does it call the running spamd in the background?
> Can someone explain the relati
I know zip about python, so don't know where to start debugging this, but
periodically I'm getting the following coming back:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Command died with status 1:
"/usr/local/sbin/spamcheck.py". Command output:
exceptions.SystemExit: 75
but no idea how to debug it ...
Anyone?
I just upgraded our server to SpamAssassin 2.4, now that its available
through FreeBSD ports ... I've got Razor-agents installed, as well as
Pyzor.
I'm using spamcheck.py to act as an LMTP filter between postfix and cyrus
IMAPd ...
I have it running with the following options:
/usr/local/bin/s
anyone see this problem before?
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Command died with status 1: "/usr/local/bin/lmtpproxy.py".
Command output: Traceback (most recent call last): File
"/usr/local/bin/lmtpproxy.py", line 230, in ? main(sys.argv) File
"/usr/local/bin/lmtpproxy.py", line 227, i
are you running spamd with the -q -x options?
On Sun, 16 Jun 2002, David B. Bitton wrote:
> I followed the info in regards to setting up the SQL db lookup. I
> uncommneted out the lines in /etc/spamassassin/10_misc.cf (i'm using debian)
> that pertain to the db connection. When I send a test
get rid of the procmail link, plug in spamcheck.py as the lmtp connection
for postfix, and have spamcheck.py then dump to cyrus' lmtp server for
filtering (sieve) and delivery ...
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, David B. Bitton wrote:
> Looks like I found the problem w/ Cyrus reporting invalid header. I
Just found this looking through GeoCrawler:
=
This has come up before a few times (not quite an FAQ though). The
concensus at the end of the discussion ends up being that deciding whether
or not to process mail through SA is best handled upstream of SA -- why
invoke
How hard would it be to change it so that if required_hits == 0, then it
skips all checks and just passes through the message with no changes as
!is_spam?
Essentially, i want to install this on several servers, one of which has
>5k users ... I want to install it so that, by default, it short-cir
Is now available, for those that are using both ...
*Very* base functionality is in there right now, which is limited to just
changing the required_hits value, but that was just to get it into the
repository ... we've already got a load of changes that should be
committed later on tonight ...
W
Guess this is more for Craig directly, but has anyone thought to add a
simple 'spamassassin=on' user preference? I'm looking at implementing
spamassasin on a 4k+ mail server, but we want to default it to being off
... what we are looking at is increasing the required to some arbitrarily
high num
ks like a
charm ...
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > Has anyone toyed with this to create a lmtp-spam proxy? I believe
> > there was mentioned *some* reason why lmtpproxyd in Cyrus wouldn't do for
> >
Its up to you, but I was thinking of adding in code to Makefile.PL to
check for Python and, if it exists, install it similar to spamproxyd ...
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> How about contrib/lmtpproxy.py?
>
> C
>
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> MGF>
> M
The last place I looked was the first place I should have ...
Craig, if its okay with James, would it be possible to take
contrib/spamcheck.py and move it to lmtpproxy/lmtpproxy.py? So that it
stands out a bit more? I'm going to work on moving to this righ tnow, but
it looks like I've finally
Hey all ...
After I sent out my last email, I spent some more time scouring
the web looking for some way of doing this, and came across:
http://www.btinternet.com/~davecridland/sanifilter-HOWTO/t1.html
Its a Virus scanner that works at the LMTP level, which, from what
I
Thu, 23 May 2002 10:38:19 -0300 (ADT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 10:39:34 -0300 (ADT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: test2
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Ver
evel:
===
Notice the 'required=5.1'? My required is the default 5.0 ... I've never
changed from what was installed, but she has ...
This, again, will only work properly if there is only one recipient :(
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2002
On Thu, 23 May 2002, dman wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 09:30:44AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> | On Thu, 23 May 2002, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> ...
> | > What are Cyrus and Sieve? They seem a bit too generic to feed to a search
> | > engine with much success.
>
Cyrus IMAPd is a 'black box/secure' IMAP/POP3 server developed by Carnegie
Mellon University ... go to Google, type 'cyrus' and its the first two
entries that come up ...
Sieve is a filtering extension to Cyrus that, again, is designed for a
'black box/secure' environment ... go to Google, type
On Sat, 18 May 2002, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > For instance, if you use postfix+content_filter being spamproxyd, the
> > message is passed to spamproxyd, but it doesn't have any knowledge of
> > the recipients themselves .
How are ppl doing this?
For instance, if you use postfix+content_filter being spamproxyd, the
message is passed to spamproxyd, but it doesn't have any knowledge of the
recipients themselves ... does it? If it doesn't, then how are ppl making
use of the per-user preferences?
_
How are ppl doing this? I'm using Postfix+content_filter -> cyrus myself,
but for Per User Preferences to work, you have to do it at the delivery
end of things, so using Postfix' content_filter wouldn't work ... and I
don't think that spamass-milter would either, since, again, that is
before the
Today, the Horde team committed code that allows someone setting up a
Horde mail system to enable a 'Report as Spam' option that can use a
program to do the submission ...
The example I got them to put into the conf file is spamassassin -r, but
any program that can be pipe'd into should work jus
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Jim Holmes wrote:
> --On Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:21 AM -0400 "Marc G. Fournier"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Just curious, but in 2.11, spamproxyd requires '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to
> > be set, or it won't run
Just curious, but in 2.11, spamproxyd requires '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to
be set, or it won't run ... with it set, all messages triggered as SPAM go
to a central address, which, IMHO, is "A Bad Thing" ...
Has anyone looked at changing:
my $status = $spamtest->check($mail);
if ($status->is_s
Stupid question, but is this a bug in razor 1.20, or spamassassin?
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Matthew Cline wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 March 2002 01:54 pm, Scott Baker wrote:
> > I'm trying to get the razor checks working... I installed the razor client
> > and all the other CPAN dependancies it had a
requiers a 'reporting address' to send the spam to ... which, from what
I've been able to tell, prevents it from being delivered to the original
recipient if marked as spam ...
am I missing something? I want the email to be sent to the recipient, I
just want them to know that it is spam, or, at
old, known problem ... downgrade to razor agfents 1.19 ...
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Matthew Cline wrote:
> When I try using razor-report from the command line, I get this from the
> diagnostics:
>
> debug: Razor Agents 1.20, protocol version 2.
> debug: Read server list from /usr/home/matt/.razor-r
yup caught that and have it up and running ... very nice, thanks :)
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
> On 2/28/02 4:57 AM, "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > 'K, removed the version from ports I had installed ear
idn't upgrade right -- you're still picking up an old .cf file.
>
> C
>
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 14:20:51 -0400 (AST)
> > From: Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [SAtalk] U
m:sub check_for_unique_subject_id {
EvalTests.pm:sub check_for_very_long_text {
earth# pwd
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Ian R. Justman wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> >
> > earth# /usr/bin/spamproxyd localhost:100
Ya, but looking at the code, this doesn't even appear to be related to the
proxyd itself:(
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Ian R. Justman wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> >
> > earth# /usr/bin/spamproxyd localhost:10025 localhost:10026
> >
earth# /usr/bin/spamproxyd localhost:10025 localhost:10026
Failed to run A_FROM_IN_AUTO_WLIST SpamAssassin test, skipping:
(Can't locate object method "check_for_auto_whitelist" via package
"Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerM
Could you send over the shell script you created?
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > anyone successfully using this?
>
> Yes.
>
> > if so, how do you have it setup?
>
> I followed the instructions for
anyone successfully using this? if so, how do you have it setup? I've
tried smtpproxyd, but it doesn't appear to actually do any filtering ...
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamass
Morning all ...
I think I've set everythign up right ... fixed the Mail::Audit
issue as recommended on the list, manually run /usr/local/bin/spamproxyd
from the command line, then change main.cf to add:
content_filter = smtp:localhost:10025
and master.cf to add:
localhost:1002
H ... I missed the gist of the thread here, but I work at a University
where all the students ideas are numeric, with a trailing alpha character
(##[a-z]@) ...
its the way its always been here, from long before I arrived ... but if
I'm getting an idea just from the subject, such a 'block
Has anyone figured out the issue with spamass-filter?
On 17 Feb 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Should be stable -- no real changes to it for a few days now.
>
> C
>
> On Sun, 2002-02-17 at 17:32, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > How stable is today's (last night's?) CVS?
> >
> > If I get no complaints,
there is www.milter.org, and I'm CC'ng Georg on this also ...
On 14 Feb 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Oops, looks like I forgot to actually CC the list last time. I am now
> anyways. Conrad, not sure if you're following the list dicsussion
> (subject: "Partial analysis of FreeBSD/spamass-milter
-
> From: Craig Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 6:51 PM
> To: Kirk Davis
> Cc: 'Marc G. Fournier'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Partial analysis of FreeBSD/spamass-milter hang
> ...
>
>
> $ for i in 1 2 3 4 5
'K, figured I'd throw out something that I don't think any of us have yet
:)
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
> I think in theory it should be fine with 5.0; 5.5 should be very fine.
>
> C
>
> on 2/13/02 9:47 PM, Marc G. Fournier at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
h. I would be great if we can
> > squash this one bug.
> >
> > Kirk
> >
> > Kirk Davis
> > Senior Network Analyst, ITS
> > Edmonton Public Schools
> > (780) 429-8308
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original
t (time permitting).
> >
> > The threading suport in FreeBSD is VERY different from Linux and that is why
> > I started looking at spamass-milter.
> >
> > Kirk
> >
> > Kirk Davis
> > Senior Network Analyst, ITS
> > Edmonton Public Schools
> &g
ne bug.
>
> Kirk
>
> Kirk Davis
> Senior Network Analyst, ITS
> Edmonton Public Schools
> (780) 429-8308
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13,
s is either a
> BSD bug or a perl-on-BSD bug, I think. There might be a way to work
> around it though -- the trick would be to find some other forking tcp
> daemon which does work...
>
> C
>
> On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 19:07, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
forks to see how far it's getting before it
> jams up.
>
> C
>
> On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 18:08, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > Don't know how helpful this will be, but, just started it up and watched
> > it hang ...
> >
> > According to /var/log/
> jams up.
>
> C
>
> On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 18:08, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > Don't know how helpful this will be, but, just started it up and watched
> > it hang ...
> >
> > According to /var/log/maillog, as previously noted, the hang is
Don't know how helpful this will be, but, just started it up and watched
it hang ...
According to /var/log/maillog, as previously noted, the hang is based on a
simultaneous arrival of two messages:
Feb 12 22:01:53 earth sendmail[91753]: g1D21pkw091747: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
delay=00:00:02, x
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Manager - Systems Admin & Networking
> Hunter Engineering Company
>
>
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 11:00 AM
> > To: Mark Roedel
> > Cc:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Kirk Davis wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> I am the one who did up the 2.01 FreeBSD port. I hope to get the
> spamass-milter port done soon but I just arrive back from a weeks vacation
> so I will be playing catch-up over the new couple of days.
>
> This is the same proble
never cease
> LeTourneau University | to be entertained."
> Longview, Texas, USA | -- John Powell
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 3:07 PM
Morning all ...
First off, am running on a FreeBSD system, with as much as
possible installed from ports ..
Compiled/installed sendmail-sasl (sendmail 8.12+milter), installed
spamassassin from ports, which is 2.01, and installed spamass-milter from
sourceforge ... got everything
Morning all ...
Just got Spamaassasin installed on one of my servers, and it works
pretty good for several messages and then it appeasr that the
spamass-milter program, used to talk between sendmail and spamc, just
"dies" ... process stays running, but it hangs there not doing anything
.
54 matches
Mail list logo
