Anyone know of any reason that spamd would only for a single child?
stracing the process I'm seeing it spin in wait4, but it's not ever
forking more than one child process to handle incoming requests.
Needless to say this is having a bad impact on performance.
Running with 2.50-cvs.
-- Nathan
Looking at the current docs, pyzor_path and dcc_path appear to be listed
in the non-privileged section of the config. I surely hope that is just
a documentation typo as it is a gaping hole otherwise.
Some others that seem to me like they should be considered privileged:
*_timeout
Does SA do any scoring based on the combination of rules?
Seems like this would be a good way to handle some of the mutations and
avoid SA changes that some spams are using. Basically, add some extra
small number of positive/negative points based on messages that include
combinations of rules.
Just got a penis enlargement spam with Time - 1:57:19 pm in the
subject.
Might be a pattern worth matching on worth an extra half-point or so.
-- Nathan
Nathan Neulinger EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of
I've got SA up and running wonderfully with razor, dcc, and SQL based
per-user config on our qmail server. I have another serer elsewhere that
is running sendmail that I'm planning on testing out SA on. (Separate
organization.)
First question - can someone send me a copy of the generated
NN This code:
NN
NN if (!$triplets_loaded) {
NN my $filename = $self-{main}-{rules_filename} .
NN /triplets.txt;
NN
NN if (!open (TRIPLETS, $filename)) {
NN dbg (failed to open '$filename', cannot check
dictionary);
NN return 1;
NN }
NN
NN
This code:
if (!$triplets_loaded) {
my $filename = $self-{main}-{rules_filename} . /triplets.txt;
if (!open (TRIPLETS, $filename)) {
dbg (failed to open '$filename', cannot check dictionary);
return 1;
}
is giving me this output from spamd:
debug: checking RBL
Seems to me that coming up with rules to match on multiple received
lines would be the key... Although it's still forgeable you can probably
do quite a bit of analysis on it, such as it having to go through two of
ebays servers for an ebay email, and the dates/etc.
These rules could be even more
Might be worth doing the check on the rounded number, just to eliminate
the visual confusion.
-- Nathan
Nathan Neulinger EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Missouri - Rolla Phone: (573) 341-4841
The biggest problem with -S is due to the ordering of the rule checks.
If all of the negative rules (or at least the _large_ negative rules)
were processed first, it would probably be ok, but right now (or at
least with 2.20) - if you enabled it, the whitelisting would never get
used, since it
We have our wrapper script (replacement hook in qmail) check to see if a
trigger file/marker exists on the user's account. If not, it gets passed
through without ever touching SA. Otherwise, depending on which marker
was found, different behavior can occur.
-- Nathan
I just started looking at sql based user configs, and noticed that it
seems to not completely work.
I've been testing with spamc -c. I have two entries in userpref
user whitelist_from someaddr
user required_hits 6
the required_hits one is working (I see the output change from
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Missouri - Rolla Phone: (573) 341-4841
Computing Services Fax: (573) 341-4216
-Original Message-
From: Neulinger, Nathan
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:57 AM
To: Spam Assassin
Subject: [SAtalk] Problem with sql user
13 matches
Mail list logo
