Hi there,
who on earth registers all these false positives in Razor?! Each day I get a
couple of false positives over the Debian-User mailing list, messages that are
CLEARLY NO SPAM:
>Message-ID: <007901c25f5d$d31aa050$805b4181@damien>
>From: "Joe Emenaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PRO
Hi guys,
could you please try to verify whether the following potential bug in SA 2.40-
cvs is still present in current versions?
I received the following e-mail message and noticed dozens of 'charset="US-
ASCII"' headers in the *body* of the message. Upon further inspection I
noticed that the
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:07:32 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 10:42:05AM +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
>> could you please try to verify whether the following potential bug in SA =
>2.40-
>> cvs is still present in current versions?
>
>Is there a bu
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:00:35 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 08:54:16PM +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
>> No, I fear I didn't file a bug because I'm not even sure it's a bug on SA=
>'s=20
>> side. I was hoping that someone could comm
On Mon, 07 Oct 2002 23:41:42 -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
>Spamassassin 2.42 packages for Debian GNU/Linux "woody" are now available!
>
>Add the following to your /etc/apt/sources.list:
>deb http://people.debian.org/~duncf/debian/ woody main
>
>Now, apt-get update, and apt-get upgrade. You will h
On Tue, 08 Oct 2002 16:18:43 +0200, DEFFONTAINES Vincent wrote:
>Was
>"libnet-smtp-server-perl" backported by anyone that you know of?
You should be able to use the "testing" version of that package without any
problems. This is what I'm doing.
--
L I N U X .~.
The Choice /V
This French spam just came across the XFS for Linux ML:
>Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g99I5KtG005084;
> Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:05:20 -0700
>Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Wed, 09 Oct 2002 10:56:31 -
070
On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 21:39:27 +0200, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
[...]
>> On http://www.bondedsender.org/referred.html it says to report the
>> message. Of course I will not do that -- I fear that might have the
>> adverse effect of producing even more spam. :-(
>
>... and of course won't Bonded Sender
On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 22:50:54 -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
>"Ralf G. R. Bergs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> You should be able to use the "testing" version of that package without any
>> problems. This is what I'm doing.
>
>Well, not w
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:21:49 -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 02:14:27PM +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
>> Duncan,
>>
>> the following snippet in your port of SA 2.43 gives ugly regular warnings
from
>> the automunter:
>>
>> Serve
FYI: The same problem exists in the /usr/bin/spamassassin file:
use lib '/home/duncf/spamassassin-
2.43/debian/spamassassin/usr/local/share/perl/5.6.1'; # substituted at
'make' time
==BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE==========
>From: "Ralf G. R. Be
11 matches
Mail list logo
