Justin Mason wrote:
[...]
Further examination of the raw message showed that the MIME boundaries
don't seem to match, therefore Mozilla obviously can't decompose the
message.
[...]
anyone??? I really need to get this solved ASAP, since users are already
complaining... :-(
Sorry, I haven't a clue.
Hi there,
anyone??? I really need to get this solved ASAP, since users are already
complaining... :-(
Thanks,
Ralf
Original Message
Subject: "report_safe 1" breaks MIME messages
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 08:41:01 +0100
From: Ralf G. R. Bergs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi there,
I'm pretty sure this has already been discussed here, but I can't find
anything appropriate in the mail archives... :-(
I've just received a message (erroneously) tagged as spam by my
SpamAssassin installation (SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp)).
When I tried to open this mess
Leon Oosterwijk wrote:
I would like some feedback from you all on the following idea. What if
spamassassin followed unsubscribe links for all emails that came through
it's filter for emails that are obviously spam. This way people would
automatically get unsubbed from some of these lists.
Rule #1
Simon Byrnand wrote:
At 20:43 4/09/2003 +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
Jim Porter wrote:
score RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM 0
score X_OSIRU_DUL 0
score X_OSIRU_DUL_FH0
score X_OSIRU_OPEN_RELAY0
score X_OSIRU_SPAMWARE_SITE 0
score X_OSIRU_SPAM_SRC 0
Jim Porter wrote:
score RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM 0
score X_OSIRU_DUL 0
score X_OSIRU_DUL_FH0
score X_OSIRU_OPEN_RELAY0
score X_OSIRU_SPAMWARE_SITE 0
score X_OSIRU_SPAM_SRC 0
From what I understood, this would disable rbl checking of
osirusoft.com, bu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
The directories /etc/mail/spamassassin and /usr/share/spamassassin are
hardcoded into spamassassin as default directories for rule files.
[...]
or the CONFIGURATION FILES section in:
man spamassassin
or
man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
Sorry, missed the first one. I didn'
Patrick Morris schrieb:
SA reads any config files in /etc/mail/spamassassin automatically.
Sorry, wasn't aware of this, it's not in the manpages (or is it?!).
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://think
Martin Radford schrieb:
[...]
4) I am new to spamassassin. What parameter should I use in my
configuration to cause spamassassin to stop using osirusoft open relay?
See the news article at http://news.spamassassin.org/
The instructions given there can't work, IMHO, because they're incomplete:
>H
FYI: The same problem exists in the /usr/bin/spamassassin file:
use lib '/home/duncf/spamassassin-
2.43/debian/spamassassin/usr/local/share/perl/5.6.1'; # substituted at
'make' time
==BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE==========
>From: "Ralf G. R. Be
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:21:49 -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 02:14:27PM +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
>> Duncan,
>>
>> the following snippet in your port of SA 2.43 gives ugly regular warnings
from
>> the automunter:
>>
>> Serve
On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 22:50:54 -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
>"Ralf G. R. Bergs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> You should be able to use the "testing" version of that package without any
>> problems. This is what I'm doing.
>
>Well, not w
On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 21:39:27 +0200, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
[...]
>> On http://www.bondedsender.org/referred.html it says to report the
>> message. Of course I will not do that -- I fear that might have the
>> adverse effect of producing even more spam. :-(
>
>... and of course won't Bonded Sender
This French spam just came across the XFS for Linux ML:
>Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g99I5KtG005084;
> Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:05:20 -0700
>Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Wed, 09 Oct 2002 10:56:31 -
070
On Tue, 08 Oct 2002 16:18:43 +0200, DEFFONTAINES Vincent wrote:
>Was
>"libnet-smtp-server-perl" backported by anyone that you know of?
You should be able to use the "testing" version of that package without any
problems. This is what I'm doing.
--
L I N U X .~.
The Choice /V
On Mon, 07 Oct 2002 23:41:42 -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
>Spamassassin 2.42 packages for Debian GNU/Linux "woody" are now available!
>
>Add the following to your /etc/apt/sources.list:
>deb http://people.debian.org/~duncf/debian/ woody main
>
>Now, apt-get update, and apt-get upgrade. You will h
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:00:35 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 08:54:16PM +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
>> No, I fear I didn't file a bug because I'm not even sure it's a bug on SA=
>'s=20
>> side. I was hoping that someone could comm
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:07:32 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 10:42:05AM +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
>> could you please try to verify whether the following potential bug in SA =
>2.40-
>> cvs is still present in current versions?
>
>Is there a bu
Hi guys,
could you please try to verify whether the following potential bug in SA 2.40-
cvs is still present in current versions?
I received the following e-mail message and noticed dozens of 'charset="US-
ASCII"' headers in the *body* of the message. Upon further inspection I
noticed that the
Hi there,
who on earth registers all these false positives in Razor?! Each day I get a
couple of false positives over the Debian-User mailing list, messages that are
CLEARLY NO SPAM:
>Message-ID: <007901c25f5d$d31aa050$805b4181@damien>
>From: "Joe Emenaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PRO
20 matches
Mail list logo
