Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.60 was hit-and-miss for me

2003-09-15 Thread Randy Schultz
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Scott Lambert wrote: -}> Bob Apthorpe suggested that mails over a large limit (100K maybe) get -}> dropped. That's not the problem I'm facing, although now I'll know that if I -}> see a very large mail drop through unprocessed it's not a symptom of this -}> problem. Thanks. -}

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.60 was hit-and-miss for me

2003-09-12 Thread Randy Schultz
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Creede Lambard spaketh thusly: -}Oh good, maybe I'm not alone in this. :) Oh no you are not. ;> I am currently chasing the same problem. We are running SA 2.55 site-wide and are seeing tons of these. Most go though fine however some do not. I can watch in the logs as th

[SAtalk] spamassassin/milter

2002-07-13 Thread Randy Schultz
Hey all, We're running spamassassin on a test system via milter and getting some flaky results. The system is RedHat 7.2, sendmail is 8.12.5, spamassassin is 2.01 and 2.30(we've tried both, both have the same problem). The spamassassin install is default except: # cat local.cf defang_mim