Re: [SAtalk] Early DCC results

2002-05-01 Thread Scott Doty
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 02:52:42PM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote: > Have you guys turned this on for sonic.net with DCC running against a non-local > DCC server? Actually, not yet, I was in error: we aren't using DCC on our spamcan server. Kelsey and I have exchanged email about the spamd timeout

Re: [SAtalk] Early DCC results

2002-05-01 Thread Scott Doty
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 01:05:13PM -0700, Kelsey Cummings wrote: > On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 07:38:29PM +0100, Sean Rima wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Wed, 1 May 2002, Michael Moncur told this: > > > > > I did a quick check of the email I've received since

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie white list question

2002-04-19 Thread Scott Doty
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 03:16:51PM -0700, John Lang wrote: > Should this work? > > whitelist_from*@my-cast.com, *@elitepc.com Try whitelist_from *@my-cast.com whitelist_from *@elitepc.com -Scott ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [SAtalk] 'Grandfathering' SpamAssassin

2002-04-05 Thread Scott Doty
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 03:25:20PM -0800, Andrew Salamon wrote: >I've installed SpamAssassin on my company's mail server and started using > it for a few addresses. Unfortunately, that leaves me with several > megabytes of existing email that I would like to retroactively scan. I > tried th

Re: [SAtalk] Scores on the Doors

2002-04-04 Thread Scott Doty
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 11:14:32AM +0100, Tony Evans wrote: > As a totally frivolous query, what's the highest score anyone's seen on > [legitimate] incoming SPAM [using the default SA scores]? > > I've seen scores in the low 30's. 45.1 http://www.sonic.net/scott/wowspam.txt -Scott __

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamc & procmail

2002-03-29 Thread Scott Doty
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 07:09:13PM -0800, Kevin Cosgrove wrote: > The "broken" recipe looks like this: [...] > # Tag spam, pass non-spam untouched. > :0fw > | /home/kevinc/bin/spamc -p 7783 Add a "-f" (filter) to spamc so it passes the message along in your .procmailrc. -Scott __

Re: [SAtalk] Freedom of Press / Speech / Junk Mail (yah right)

2002-03-28 Thread Scott Doty
Maybe it's me, but I detect a bit of overprotectiveness being introduced on the list... On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 01:42:13AM +, Ian Briggs wrote: > Just to be on the safe side, though, can I suggest some small alterations > to the default tags: > (1) Change the subject line tag from "SPAM" to

Re: [SAtalk] Let battle commence

2002-03-28 Thread Scott Doty
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 02:01:49PM +, Matt Sergeant wrote: > http://www.bbspot.com/News/2002/03/block.html > > MS don't say it, but to anyone who knows the details it's pretty obvious > they're reselling brightmail. > > Fun times ahead. You were snookered by a satire piece. For shame, doc

Re: [SAtalk] Anyone seeing a spamc/spamd timeout?

2002-03-21 Thread Scott Doty
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 09:40:43AM -0500, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote: > Remember that spamc will only scan messages that are 250KB or smaller. > Could it be that some larger messages are the ones that you saw without any > SA headers? That's not it -- nothing particularly large about thes

[SAtalk] Anyone seeing a spamc/spamd timeout?

2002-03-20 Thread Scott Doty
I'm using spamc from my .procmailrc to talk to a dedicated spamd box. I'm seeing an intermittent failure of the system, and I thought I'd ask if others have seen the same thing. Essentially, there are spams making it through to my mailbox which don't even have an "X-Spam-Status" header. Yet, I'

Re: [SAtalk] SA's performance with mailing lists

2002-03-19 Thread Scott Doty
s and such. So far, response has been good... -Scott Doty CTO, Sonic.net Nick Handle: SCD ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Proposed "FROM_SPAMLAND" user response summary (was Re: [SAtalk] A better alternative to test ROUND_THE_WORLD

2002-03-07 Thread Scott Doty
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 09:50:03PM -0800, Rob McMillin wrote regarding the "FROM_SPAMLAND" test: ] http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/11679/350/7984404/ > /\.(?:kr|cn|cl|ar|hk|il|th|tw|sg|za|tr|ma|ua|in|pe)(?:[\s\)\]]|$)/ > Let the spear-chucking commence! I took this suggestion to ou

Re: [SAtalk] Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse

2002-03-05 Thread Scott Doty
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:20:46PM -0800, Scott Doty wrote: > > I wasn't aware that nilsimsa required one to check against all the > hashes in the database. I take it there's no way to index the hashes > to speed up matches? (e.g., maybe only check hashes that have ap

Re: [SAtalk] Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse

2002-03-05 Thread Scott Doty
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:14:18AM +, Matt Sergeant wrote: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Scott Doty wrote: > > One of our senior system administrators, Kelsey, has had contact with Vipul > > -- I understand Vipul is working on incorporating "fuzzy" hashes into Razor > &g

Re: [SAtalk] Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse

2002-03-04 Thread Scott Doty
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 02:29:14PM -0500, Rose, Bobby wrote: > I've perused the razor list archives and my take is that they will > release the server daemon once they deal with the trust issues. They > don't want to have spammers setup a server and go thru and delete all > the hashes from the da