Re: [RulesEmporium] RE: [SAtalk] New HTML spam body obfuscation.

2004-01-14 Thread Chris Thielen
/ -Original Message- From: Jack L. Stone[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 1/13/04 6:52:28 PM To: Carl R. Friend[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [RulesEmporium] RE: [SAtalk] New HTML spam body obfuscation. TopPost

Re: [RulesEmporium] RE: [SAtalk] New HTML spam body obfuscation.

2004-01-14 Thread Justin Mason
: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [RulesEmporium] RE: [SAtalk] New HTML spam body obfuscation. TopPost: Could someone please tell me how to run a summary like the one below against the corpus? Thanks okay, so i did... i see no reason to use

Re: [RulesEmporium] RE: [SAtalk] New HTML spam body obfuscation.

2004-01-13 Thread Carl R. Friend
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Dallas L. Engelken wrote: okay, so i did... i see no reason to use these rules, unless this becomes a common tactic. OVERALL SPAM HAM S/O SCORE NAME 10970 6083 48870.555 0.000.00 (all messages) 2201.000

Re: [RulesEmporium] RE: [SAtalk] New HTML spam body obfuscation.

2004-01-13 Thread Jack L. Stone
TopPost: Could someone please tell me how to run a summary like the one below against the corpus? Thanks okay, so i did... i see no reason to use these rules, unless this becomes a common tactic. OVERALL SPAM HAM S/O SCORE NAME 10970 6083 48870.555 0.00