/
-Original Message-
From: Jack L. Stone[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 1/13/04 6:52:28 PM
To: Carl R. Friend[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RulesEmporium] RE: [SAtalk] New HTML spam body obfuscation.
TopPost
: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RulesEmporium] RE: [SAtalk] New HTML spam body obfuscation.
TopPost:
Could someone please tell me how to run a summary like the one below
against the corpus?
Thanks
okay, so i did... i see no reason to use
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
okay, so i did... i see no reason to use these rules, unless this
becomes a common tactic.
OVERALL SPAM HAM S/O SCORE NAME
10970 6083 48870.555 0.000.00 (all messages)
2201.000
TopPost:
Could someone please tell me how to run a summary like the one below
against the corpus?
Thanks
okay, so i did... i see no reason to use these rules, unless this
becomes a common tactic.
OVERALL SPAM HAM S/O SCORE NAME
10970 6083 48870.555 0.00