[SAtalk] (not) up to date SpamAssassin

2003-11-06 Thread Lukreme
My spam assassin is still 2.60-rc6: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,CLICK_BELOW autolearn=ham version=2.60-rc6 So cpan install Mail::SpamAssassin CPAN: Storable loaded ok Going to read /home/kreme/.cpan/Metadata Database was generated on Sun, 02 Nov 2003

Re: [SAdev] Re: [SAtalk] (not) up to date SpamAssassin

2003-11-06 Thread John Peacock
Justin Mason wrote: CPAN thinks of them both as 2.60, and doesn't differentiate between finals and RC's. Update with a tarball. Great. We'll have to avoid using rcN designations in future I think... I think that there was some discussion about changing the CPAN indexer to use the 'version'

[SAtalk] (not) up to date SpamAssassin

2003-11-05 Thread Lukreme
My spam assassin is still 2.60-rc6: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,CLICK_BELOW autolearn=ham version=2.60-rc6 So cpan install Mail::SpamAssassin CPAN: Storable loaded ok Going to read /home/kreme/.cpan/Metadata Database was generated on Sun, 02 Nov 2003

Re: [SAtalk] (not) up to date SpamAssassin

2003-11-05 Thread Matt Kettler
At 07:16 PM 11/5/2003, Lukreme wrote: My spam assassin is still 2.60-rc6: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,CLICK_BELOW autolearn=ham version=2.60-rc6 So snip Going to write /home/kreme/.cpan/Metadata Mail::SpamAssassin is up to date. cpan color me confused CPAN

Re: [SAtalk] (not) up to date SpamAssassin

2003-11-05 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt Kettler writes: At 07:16 PM 11/5/2003, Lukreme wrote: My spam assassin is still 2.60-rc6: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,CLICK_BELOW autolearn=ham version=2.60-rc6 So snip Going to write

Re: [SAtalk] (not) up to date SpamAssassin

2003-11-05 Thread Vivek Khera
JM == Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Going to write /home/kreme/.cpan/Metadata Mail::SpamAssassin is up to date. force install Mail::SpamAssassin JM Great. We'll have to avoid using rcN designations in future I think... Yep. Just stick with the underscores. --