Re: [SAtalk] [Celina1737e43@hanmail.net: Naked chixs]

2002-05-21 Thread Daniel Rogers
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 09:10:06AM -0700, Scott Nelson wrote: > I see something in SA 2.20; > uri HTTP_ESCAPED_HOST /^https?\:\/\/[^\/]*%/ > describe HTTP_ESCAPED_HOST Uses %-escapes inside a URL's hostname > score HTTP_ESCAPED_HOST 1.849 > > I think ESCAPES_DIGIT /%3[0-9]

Re: [SAtalk] [Celina1737e43@hanmail.net: Naked chixs]

2002-05-18 Thread Daniel Rogers
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 09:10:06AM -0700, Scott Nelson wrote: > I think ESCAPES_DIGIT /%3[0-9]/ might be a good test too, > and not just inside URIs. Escaping /any/ character that > doesn't need to be is suspect. Yeah, believe it or not, it some of these, they're even does %2E for the '.' betwe

Re: [SAtalk] [Celina1737e43@hanmail.net: Naked chixs]

2002-05-18 Thread Scott Nelson
At 08:02 AM 5/18/02 -0700, Daniel Rogers wrote: >These people have been obsfucating their URL in a bunch of diffrent ways. >We don't seem to have any test that matches on that. > I see something in SA 2.20; uri HTTP_ESCAPED_HOST /^https?\:\/\/[^\/]*%/ describe HTTP_ESCAPED_HOST Uses %

[SAtalk] [Celina1737e43@hanmail.net: Naked chixs]

2002-05-18 Thread Daniel Rogers
These people have been obsfucating their URL in a bunch of diffrent ways. We don't seem to have any test that matches on that. Also, what happened to the test for this style of unique ID at the end of the body? Dan. - Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTEC