I love getting credit for that sort of thing. Glad to help. Even if I was
just regurgitating things folks have told me before.
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Uwe Willenbacher wrote:
> Again, thanks to Charlie Watts, I was able to compile spamc and it is
> happily working on my Solaris box -- I really app
Again, thanks to Charlie Watts, I was able to compile spamc and it is
happily working on my Solaris box -- I really appreatiate your help. Not
being a programmer, I can only imagine working with "us whiners":)
- Uwe
--On Tuesday, February 19, 2002 12:15 PM -0800 Craig Hughes
<[EMAIL PROTECTE
Dammit, that's the change I made to get it to compile on whatever that
other platform was. I think I'll actually change it back, because I
suspect that one guy's setup was just not right. I'll revert
Makefile.PL to link spamc against the same libs perl was linked
against. It's overkill, but it'
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 23:25:11 -0700 (Mountain Standard Time)
Charlie Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Uwe Willenbacher wrote:
>
>> Sorry to bug you, but I decided today to install the latest greatest
>>dev
>> version of SpamAssassin 2.1, however, I got following compile err
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Uwe Willenbacher wrote:
> Sorry to bug you, but I decided today to install the latest greatest dev
> version of SpamAssassin 2.1, however, I got following compile error:
>
> gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
> -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O Hi all,
Hi all,
Sorry to bug you, but I decided today to install the latest greatest dev
version of SpamAssassin 2.1, however, I got following compile error:
gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O Hi all,
spamd/spamc.c \
-o spamd/sp
