On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 07:40:24PM -0500, Terry Milnes is rumored to have said:
>
> Haha this guy "Doctor Electron" is a moron oops I defamed him...
As any lawyer (I'm not one) would tell you, the truth is an absolute defense. If what
you say is true, it can't be considered slander/defamati
Haha this guy "Doctor Electron" is a moron oops I defamed him...
His paper "The Smart Gateway: Port-to-Local-Host Address Mapping" was
also entertaining
tm.
Matthew Cline wrote:
http://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/ispassassin.html
Hmmm... The article claims that SA itself genera
Original Message-
From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:52 AM
To: Spam Assassin Talk
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Anti-SA article: "ISP Assassin"
> - Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Cline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&
MAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:10 AM
Cc: Spam Assassin Talk
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Anti-SA article: "ISP Assassin"
Haha this guy "Doctor Electron" is a moron oops I defamed him...
His paper "The Smart Gateway: Port-to-Local-Host Address Mapping&q
> - Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Cline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Spam Assassin Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 9:48 AM
> Subject: [SAtalk] Anti-SA article: "ISP Assassin"
>
> http://www
Haha this guy "Doctor Electron" is a moron oops I defamed him...
His paper "The Smart Gateway: Port-to-Local-Host Address Mapping" was
also entertaining
tm.
Matthew Cline wrote:
http://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/ispassassin.html
Hmmm... The article claims that SA itself generate
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
> > http://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/ispassassin.html
>
> Its crap like this article that keep ISPs from even telling users
> they have the ability to use SA!!! I've seen major ISPs never tell
> there customers unless they ask for some antispam
--On Wednesday, November 05, 2003 2:07 PM + Darren Coleman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The funny thing about that article is that he claims his "private email"
> was altered, when in fact the email in question was a wide-copy
> unsolicited press release. I normally call the latter spam.
>
>
> http://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/ispassassin.html
>
> Hmmm... The article claims that SA itself generates spam,
> since it inserts an
> "ad" for SA into messages it tags for spam (though I fail to
> see how a link
> to http://spamassassin.org/tag/ could be considered an ad).
>
is vitriol. Almost, but not quite.
Daz
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Marcio Merlone
> Sent: 05 November 2003 12:45
> To: Matthew Cline
> Cc: Spam Assassin Talk
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Anti-SA article: &q
> http://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/ispassassin.html
>
> Hmmm... The article claims that SA itself generates spam,
> since it inserts an
> "ad" for SA into messages it tags for spam (though I fail to
> see how a link
> to http://spamassassin.org/tag/ could be considered an ad).
> It
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 00:28:58 -0800
Matthew Cline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/ispassassin.html
>
> Hmmm... The article claims that SA itself generates spam, since it inserts an
> "ad" for SA into messages it tags for spam (though I fail to see how a link
http://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/ispassassin.html
Hmmm... The article claims that SA itself generates spam, since it inserts an
"ad" for SA into messages it tags for spam (though I fail to see how a link
to http://spamassassin.org/tag/ could be considered an ad). It considers
rule des
13 matches
Mail list logo
