Re[2]: [SAtalk] Bayesian 100% on all my mail

2003-11-26 Thread Robert Menschel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Simon, Wednesday, November 26, 2003, 12:09:39 AM, you wrote: SB> IMHO Nigerian style spams will always be "Bayes poison" simply due to SB> the nature of the wording of the messages being so similar to normal SB> conversational text compared to

Re: [SAtalk] Bayesian 100% on all my mail

2003-11-26 Thread Simon Byrnand
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Robert Menschel wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hello Aaron, >> >> Tuesday, November 25, 2003, 8:58:58 AM, you wrote: >> >> AY> ... Recently I started getting a lot of false positives with SA >> 2.60. >> AY> I noticed that all my mail was g

Re: [SAtalk] Bayesian 100% on all my mail

2003-11-25 Thread David B Funk
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Robert Menschel wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello Aaron, > > Tuesday, November 25, 2003, 8:58:58 AM, you wrote: > > AY> ... Recently I started getting a lot of false positives with SA 2.60. > AY> I noticed that all my mail was getting a bayesi

Re: [SAtalk] Bayesian 100% on all my mail

2003-11-25 Thread Robert Menschel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Aaron, Tuesday, November 25, 2003, 8:58:58 AM, you wrote: AY> ... Recently I started getting a lot of false positives with SA 2.60. AY> I noticed that all my mail was getting a bayesian score of 99 to AY> 100%. ...My best guess is that since t

[SAtalk] Bayesian 100% on all my mail

2003-11-25 Thread Aaron Young
I've been using SpamAssassin since about May. Recently I started getting a lot of false positives with SA 2.60. I noticed that all my mail was getting a bayesian score of 99 to 100%. I'm not exactly sure why it was happening. My best guess is that since the bayes database only holds a limited