RE: [SAtalk] BigEvil PF

2004-01-29 Thread Tom Meunier
EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Paul Barbeau > Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 2:02 PM > To: Spamassassin List > Subject: [SAtalk] BigEvil PF > > I am getting a lot of BigEvilList_72 > (http://www.exclaimer.co.uk) FP as one of my group clients > get mail from lawyer that use

[SAtalk] BigEvil PF

2004-01-26 Thread Paul Barbeau
I am getting a lot of BigEvilList_72 (http://www.exclaimer.co.uk) FP as one of my group clients get mail from lawyer that uses this product. Can someone provide some feed back on why this is a rule so insted of just deleting it i know have an educated answer to my client Thank Paul -

RE: [SAtalk] BigEvil PF

2004-01-26 Thread Chris Santerre
Barbeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 3:02 PM > To: Spamassassin List > Subject: [SAtalk] BigEvil PF > > > I am getting a lot of BigEvilList_72 > (http://www.exclaimer.co.uk) FP as one > of my group clients get mail from lawyer that uses this &g

RE: [SAtalk] BigEvil PF

2004-01-26 Thread Kelson Vibber
At 05:02 AM 1/26/2004, Tom Meunier wrote: You're asking why would "exotic playthings" or "excellentoffers" be a spam indicator? No, he's asking why exclaimer.co.uk would be considered a spam sign: At 12:02 PM 1/23/2004, Paul Barbeau wrote: I am getting a lot of BigEvilList_72 (http://www.exclaimer

RE: [SAtalk] BigEvil PF

2004-01-26 Thread Tom Meunier
riday, January 23, 2004 2:02 PM > To: Spamassassin List > Subject: [SAtalk] BigEvil PF > > I am getting a lot of BigEvilList_72 > (http://www.exclaimer.co.uk) FP as one of my group clients > get mail from lawyer that uses this product. Can someone > provide some feed back on

[SAtalk] BigEvil PF

2004-01-26 Thread Paul Barbeau
I am getting a lot of BigEvilList_72 (http://www.exclaimer.co.uk) FP as one of my group clients get mail from lawyer that uses this product. Can someone provide some feed back on why this is a rule so insted of just deleting it i know have an educated answer to my client Thank Paul -