Re: [SAtalk] Bug: SA classifies TheBat 2.0 mail as spam

2003-09-09 Thread Michael W. Cocke
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 14:11:58 +0200, you wrote: >SA thinks mail from TheBat 2.0 is spam: I've never seen any email from TheBat that WASN'T spam. Mike- Mornings: Evolution in action. Only the grumpy will survive. - Please note - Due to the in

Re: [SAtalk] Bug: SA classifies TheBat 2.0 mail as spam

2003-09-07 Thread Roman Katzer
On Sunday, September 7, 2003, 18:11:29, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > please post bugs on bugzilla.spamassassin.org, otherwise we may not see > them and/or remember about them. Thanks for the pointer, I just did. Roman -- Roman Katzer, Aachen, Germany You know those people who won't take no for a

Re: [SAtalk] Bug: SA classifies TheBat 2.0 mail as spam

2003-09-07 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 02:11:58PM +0200, Roman Katzer wrote: > Since Stefan Tanurkov is the head programmer of TheBat, I don't think he > has to fake his mail client ;-) please post bugs on bugzilla.spamassassin.org, otherwise we may not see them and/or remember about them. -- Randomly Generate

[SAtalk] Bug: SA classifies TheBat 2.0 mail as spam

2003-09-07 Thread Roman Katzer
SA thinks mail from TheBat 2.0 is spam: > Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2003 13:17:08 -0400 > From: Stefan Tanurkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: 2.00: bug in Scheduler > To: Peter Fjelsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [...] > Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: RITLABS Inc. > MIME-version: 1.0 > X-