Would it be possible for an additional mysql preferance for a threshold to
be added to an upcoming spamassassin release for mail deletion? e.g. A
user sets required_hits to 5, and sets deletion_hits to 10, any mail
between 5 and 10 is tagged, anything above 10 is deleted.
To the moderator of the FAQ:
Can we make this a FAQ?
Not to be rude to you Andrew, I know you are just asking a question but
1) a little research (reading the list archive from yesterday) would
show that the answer is no. SpamAssassin does NOT delete, it simply
marks up messages (It's not
At 04:01 PM 1/15/2004, Andrew Cranson wrote:
Would it be possible for an additional mysql preferance for a threshold to
be added to an upcoming spamassassin release for mail deletion? e.g. A
user sets required_hits to 5, and sets deletion_hits to 10, any mail
between 5 and 10 is tagged, anything
I've read the archives, and I've seen numerous answers to posts saying
that it's not supported. My question was to the developers - would they
(you) consider adding it to a future version of spamassassin?
The problem with qmail-scanner and the like is they aren't able to (from
what I've read)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 15 January 2004 13:21, Andrew Cranson wrote:
I've read the archives, and I've seen numerous answers to posts saying
that it's not supported. My question was to the developers - would they
(you) consider adding it to a future version of
--On Thursday, January 15, 2004 9:21 PM + Andrew Cranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've read the archives, and I've seen numerous answers to posts saying
that it's not supported. My question was to the developers - would they
(you) consider adding it to a future version of spamassassin?
Tom politely smacked me wit a Clue-by-four and pointed out that this IS
a FAQ.
http://wiki.spamassassin.org/w/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Thanks Tom.
Let me know how I may be of service,
=C=
* Cal Evans
* http://www.eicc.com
* We take care of your IT,
* So you can take care of your business.
*
*
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 09:21:50PM -, Andrew Cranson is rumored to have said:
I've read the archives, and I've seen numerous answers to posts saying
that it's not supported. My question was to the developers - would they
(you) consider adding it to a future version of spamassassin?
Evans
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Delete vs tagging spam
I've read the archives, and I've seen numerous answers to posts saying
that it's not supported. My question was to the developers - would they
(you) consider adding it to a future version of spamassassin
-Original Message-
From: Steve Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 4:14 PM
To: Andrew Cranson
Cc: Cal Evans; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Delete vs tagging spam
Here's the thing, though. SA is a *filter*. The MTA (or
procmail
At 01:21 PM 1/15/2004, Andrew Cranson wrote:
I've read the archives, and I've seen numerous answers to posts saying
that it's not supported. My question was to the developers - would they
(you) consider adding it to a future version of spamassassin?
It's not just a matter of not wanting to
At 02:44 PM 1/15/2004, Kang , Joseph S. wrote:
Semantics? Maybe, but if the word filter causes this kind of confusion,
maybe it shouldn't be used to describe SA.
Mail... Analyzer? Reviewer? Labeler? Scanner?
Spam... Detector? Seeker? Finder? Explorer? Konqueror? ;-)
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 04:44:40PM -0600, Kang , Joseph S. is rumored to have said:
Here's the thing, though. SA is a *filter*. The MTA (or
procmail, or whatever) hands the message to SA and expects to
get something back. If SA had the cability to delete
messages, it would break
At 02:44 PM 1/15/2004, Kang , Joseph S. wrote:
Semantics? Maybe, but if the word filter causes this kind of
confusion, maybe it shouldn't be used to describe SA.
Mail... Analyzer? Reviewer? Labeler? Scanner?
Spam... Detector? Seeker? Finder? Explorer? Konqueror? ;-)
Finder and
14 matches
Mail list logo
