[SAtalk] Generic V-whatever drug with no GV rule hits (fwd)

2003-12-08 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
I just opened a Bugzilla report for this: http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2817 (SA 2.60, Solaris, perl 5.6.1) Funny thing is, the first line of the body was had the V word with spaces between each letter, yet it didn't hit any v-whatever rules. I would think simple spaceing of

Re: [SAtalk] Generic V-whatever drug with no GV rule hits (fwd)

2003-12-08 Thread Matt Kettler
At 10:54 AM 12/8/2003, Christopher X. Candreva wrote: I just opened a Bugzilla report for this: http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2817 (SA 2.60, Solaris, perl 5.6.1) For the moment, I'd suggest a rule like this one that I just cooked up: body LOCAL_GAPPY_VIAG

Re: [SAtalk] Generic V-whatever drug with no GV rule hits (fwd)

2003-12-08 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Matt Kettler wrote: body LOCAL_GAPPY_VIAG /\bV\Wi\Wa\Wg\Wr\Wa\b/i score LOCAL_OBFU_VIAG 1.0 Shouldn't the two descriptions match ? :-) This was my version: bodyOBFU_V /V\s+[i1l]\s+a\s+g\s+r\s+a/i describeOBFU_V Contains

Re: [SAtalk] Generic V-whatever drug with no GV rule hits (fwd)

2003-12-08 Thread Matt Kettler
At 02:59 PM 12/8/2003, Christopher X. Candreva wrote: body LOCAL_GAPPY_VIAG /\bV\Wi\Wa\Wg\Wr\Wa\b/i score LOCAL_OBFU_VIAG 1.0 Shouldn't the two descriptions match ? :-) ACK!.. that's what I get for re-naming a rule.. :)

Re: [SAtalk] Generic V-whatever drug with no GV rule hits (fwd)

2003-12-08 Thread David B Funk
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Matt Kettler wrote: At 10:54 AM 12/8/2003, Christopher X. Candreva wrote: I just opened a Bugzilla report for this: http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2817 (SA 2.60, Solaris, perl 5.6.1) For the moment, I'd suggest a rule like this one that I just cooked

Re: [SAtalk] Generic V-whatever drug with no GV rule hits (fwd)

2003-12-08 Thread Matt Kettler
At 04:33 PM 12/8/2003, David B Funk wrote: Small enhancement suggestion, modify each one of those '\W' with '?' thus making successive obfuscating characters optional. With your rule there -must- be an obfuscating between each regular character, with the '?', it will catch all permutations of