At 06:56 PM 1/12/04 -0800, Robert Menschel wrote:
Has anyone else NOT been bothered by this???
Not terribly.. I had a few sneak through, but most got tagged.
One of them did manage to get a BAYES_44 rating, but that quickly changed
with a little training.
However, I will admit that I've been run
Monday, January 12, 2004, 7:57:03 AM, Greg wrote:
gic> They've noted that we give HABEAS_SWE a score of -4.6 I think. I'm
gic> adjusted it for my machines to zero. Here's the headers:
Has anyone else NOT been bothered by this???
Sure I've received some of these spam, but my SA has marked them as
They've noted that we give HABEAS_SWE a score of -4.6 I think. I'm
adjusted it for my machines to zero. Here's the headers:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from beefcake.intouch.ca (beefcake.intouch.ca [64.69.91.201])
by intouch.ca (Postfix) with ESMT
