At 04:35 PM 12/4/2003, Matt Kettler wrote:
Most autolearn-only bayes databases wind up being mostly poisoned and wind
up doing more harm than good. If you're seeing any spam with BAYES_ scores
under 20, or ham with bayes scores over 80 you've got big bayes database
problems. Spam under 50 or ham
At 03:33 PM 12/4/2003, Kurt Buff wrote:
I've also got Bayes autolearning turned on, and it's definitely active.
Is there anything I can do to help improve the detection rate?
I'd advise not using bayes with autolearning alone.. Bayes more or less
requires at least some hand-feeding in order to b
Howdy,
Well, I've implemented the new bigevil.cf, the nov2rules, and the combined
popcorn/weeds/backhair rules (dated from 2003/10/14) from
merchantsoverseas.com (Oh, thank you for both, Jennifer and Chris!), and am
now getting about 85-88% detection vs. about 70-75% before, using SA 2.60.
I've al
