[SAtalk] New (to me) spam technique

2003-06-30 Thread Robert Menschel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I haven't seen this one before ... slipped through most filtering rules. The spam has two parts -- spam in HTML, all graphics to avoid any/all text filtering, and then a text section that appears to be normal text, quoted from some source, that has

RE: [SAtalk] New (to me) spam technique

2003-06-30 Thread Darren Coleman
: 30 June 2003 14:44 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] New (to me) spam technique -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I haven't seen this one before ... slipped through most filtering rules. The spam has two parts -- spam in HTML, all graphics to avoid any/all text

Re: [SAtalk] New (to me) spam technique

2003-06-30 Thread mikea
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 03:22:39PM +0100, Darren Coleman wrote: It would be nice, although ultimately unworkable I guess, if SA could be engineered to ignore anything which isn't humanly-visible in an email. i.e. when spammers insert fake PGP signatures in font color=White/font tags to lower

RE: [SAtalk] New (to me) spam technique

2003-06-30 Thread Matt Kettler
At 03:22 PM 6/30/2003 +0100, Darren Coleman wrote: It would be nice, although ultimately unworkable I guess, if SA could be engineered to ignore anything which isn't humanly-visible in an email. i.e. when spammers insert fake PGP signatures in font color=White/font tags to lower their score - SA

Re: [SAtalk] New (to me) spam technique

2003-06-30 Thread Justin Mason
Robert Menschel writes: I haven't seen this one before ... slipped through most filtering rules. The spam has two parts -- spam in HTML, all graphics to avoid any/all text filtering, and then a text section that appears to be normal text, quoted from some source, that has nothing to do with any