RE: [SAtalk] New kind of spam

2003-10-31 Thread Covington, Chris
Autoresponder list spam? That's a good idea actually, until the list finds out which address is causing these bounce spams. The best part of the idea is that it could potentially be unintentional (someone could've let their domain expire and pool.com bought it up and auto-replies). Chris > This

Re: [SAtalk] New kind of spam

2003-10-31 Thread Marcio Merlone
BTW, I just got it replying this message :( To: "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Ken Gordon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 14:50:50 -0200 Marcio Merlone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 23:07:28 -0500 > "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: [SAtalk] New kind of spam

2003-10-31 Thread Marcio Merlone
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 23:07:28 -0500 "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I received one of these when I replied to a message from this list. > (...) > > Ken Gordon wrote: > > This looks to me to be a new, creative approach to spamming: (...) > > For more information on how you can backorder a doma

Re: [SAtalk] New kind of spam

2003-10-30 Thread Fred
I received one of these when I replied to a message from this list. Frederic Tarasevicius Internet Information Services, Inc. http://www.i-is.com/ Ken Gordon wrote: > This looks to me to be a new, creative approach to spamming: > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Thu Oct 30, 2003 6:17:51 PM

[SAtalk] New kind of spam

2003-10-30 Thread Ken Gordon
This looks to me to be a new, creative approach to spamming: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu Oct 30, 2003 6:17:51 PM Canada/Mountain To: Ken Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Undeliverable Mail: [SAtalk] SA Time out error Return-Path: <> X-Original-To: munged@ Delivered-To: munged@ Received:

Re: [SAtalk] New kind of spam?

2003-01-31 Thread Aaron Sherman
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 09:49, kcorey wrote: > Thought you guys might be interested. The spammers are getting > desperate, methinks. Many spammers now include many tricks to try to surmount SpamAssassin. Why? Because SpamAssassin is easily available to use as a test for their spam. This particular

RE: [SAtalk] New kind of spam?

2003-01-31 Thread Steve Kaiser
I'm running 2.43, and thankfully it has a rule for that: OBFUSCATING_COMMENT /[^\s>][^\s<]/ Score 2.083. -Steve -Original Message- From: kcorey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 6:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] New kind of spam?

[SAtalk] New kind of spam?

2003-01-31 Thread kcorey
Hi All, I happened to be trolling through my inbox in raw text mode, as you do, and noticed this. Thought you guys might be interested. The spammers are getting desperate, methinks. Good. May they all their fingers rot off. -Ken Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]