Well, a follow-up:
I figgered out that I probably had to “remake”
and “remake install”, etc.
Which I then proceeded to do, and then *BOOM!* I get a “compile error”
on Razor2.
Bear in mind that I had no problem
installing it before. Further bear in mind that I even erased the who
Okay, so I applied the patch as shown at:
http://spamassassin.taint.org/faq/index.cgi?req=show&file=faq02.006.htp
But I get the following message, STILL:
razor2 check skipped: No such file or directory Insecure
dependency in open while running with -T switch at
/usr/lib/perl5/s
At 7/28/03 06:31 PM , Robert Menschel wrote:
KM> I had the same problem with Bayes... eventually, I just turned it
off.
Do you have any idea why the two of you have had this problem? I've been
running OK with SA and Bayes on three different servers, and I've never
intentionally or manually wiped or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Kai,
Monday, July 28, 2003, 10:09:00 AM, you wrote:
KM> At 7/28/03 05:21 AM , Tony Hoyle wrote:
>>
>>I wipe the bayes db every couple of weeks to avoid this (over time
>>it starts giving more and more FNs). I wiped it again just after
>>sendin
At 13:21 28/07/2003 +0100, Tony Hoyle wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Kai MacTane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 July 2003 17:34
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Oops... running 2.60
>
>
> Actually, I doubt those BAYES_00 hits are doing you
At 7/28/03 05:21 AM , Tony Hoyle wrote:
I wipe the bayes db every couple of weeks to avoid this (over time
it starts giving more and more FNs). I wiped it again just after
sending the message, so it'll take a little while before the BAYES_00
creeps back again.
I had the same problem with Bayes...
> -Original Message-
> From: Kai MacTane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 July 2003 17:34
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Oops... running 2.60
>
>
> Actually, I doubt those BAYES_00 hits are doing you much
> good, either. If
> messages
At Fri Jul 25 16:42:09 2003, Tony Hoyle wrote: [reformatted]
> I've found 2.60 is a generaly bit better than 2.55, but recently the
> spammers have worked around it... I now get about a couple of dozen
> spams a day coming in with ridiculously low scores (<2, usually) -
> they're heavily exploitin
At 7/25/03 08:42 AM , Tony Hoyle wrote:
I've found 2.60 is a generaly bit better than 2.55, but recently the
spammers have worked around it... I now get about a couple of dozen spams
a day coming in with ridiculously low scores (<2, usually) - they're
heavily exploiting the low scoring HTML_IMAG
> -Original Message-
> From: Colin Henein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 July 2003 17:32
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Oops... running 2.60
>
>
> Greetings all,
>
> I've been running 2.60 for several months (must have pick
Greetings all,
I've been running 2.60 for several months (must have picked the wrong
download back there somewhere).
I haven't been having any problems, but I wanted to know if I'd be
getting better filtering with 2.55. Not sure how the rule tuning
works, and whether I'm better off with the 2.60
Hi Again
I figured out why the spam made it through. It was addressed to one of
my alternative e-mail addresses, which was white_listed, but isn't
anymore.
Sorry to add to the noise level!
Tim
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Tim wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Here's another one that sneaked by SpamAssassin 2.60-
> With cool places like http://www.wholelattelove.com - it's very likely!
> Trust me, I did it! ;)
Haha! There is hope! *grins*
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here:
http://
Sorry about that, folks. I should learn to drink more caffinated beverages
by the afternoon... but what's the likelihood of that? :-)
With cool places like http://www.wholelattelove.com - it's very likely!
Trust me, I did it! ;)
---
This S
Have I ever mentioned how much I hate Outlook Express?
It just dawned on me that I sent a reply from a joke account one of my
coworkers had put on this system... D'oh!
Sorry about that, folks. I should learn to drink more caffinated beverages
by the afternoon... but what's the likelihood of that
Ok, I think I've fixed the MANIFEST problems now, so if you already grabbed 2.30
and it failed for you, try again now and you should be OK.
C
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las V
If you look at a bug in bugzilla, in the header info at the top of the ticket,
there's a link that says "Create an attachment". Click that, then follow the
directions.
C
Olivier Nicole wrote:
ON> >Olivier, could you attach the new file to a bugzilla ticket? It's hard to
ON> >extract from your
>Olivier, could you attach the new file to a bugzilla ticket? It's hard to
>extract from your original email.
That's what I though, how to *attach* anything in bugzilla? I see
nowhere mention of such attachement.
I understood that it was not supposed to be dumped in the
"Description:" textarea,
Olivier, could you attach the new file to a bugzilla ticket? It's hard to
extract from your original email.
Thanks,
C
Olivier Nicole wrote:
ON>
ON> There was a typo in this one, I missed the 96
ON>
ON> lang fr describe DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_XX L'entête Date: est plus de 96 heures
après la
There was a typo in this one, I missed the 96
lang fr describe DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_XX L'entête Date: est plus de 96 heures après la
date de l'entête Received:
Olivier
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Confer
Uh,
I think I just removed the two doc translator people from the SF project... But
now I don't remember what your names are! If you want me to re-add you, please
email me with your sf ID.
Sorry!
C
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.
21 matches
Mail list logo
