On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 the voices made Jeremy Turner write:
JT> On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 13:42, Lance W. Haverkamp wrote:
JT> > I don't think I'll be using Spamassassin any longer. I can't imagine ANY
JT> > spam filter program not catching that email.
JT>
JT> >From what I've read on this list and on spamassassin.org, SpamAssassin
JT> is not trained to catch specific email, but to be a good defense against
JT> all kinds of spam. Therefore evaluating the worth of SpamAssassin
JT> against this one email isn't a good assumption. I did, however, read
JT> that you tried several emails with it. SpamAssassin seems to need
JT> tuning. I am looking forward to Bayes in 2.50. This will help train
JT> individual filtering sites with identifying spam, adult content, or
JT> whatever!
Getting such bad results as he did is either just the dark side of statistics
(ie bad luck) or there was something wrong with this installation; or he used
like 4 e-mails only, which got a lower score simply because he sent them
himself (which, of course, changes the headers).
--
/\___/\ /\___/\
\_@ @_/ \_@ @_/
+--oOO-(_)-OOo------------------------------------------oOO-(_)-OOo--+
| Per scientiam ad libertatem! // Through knowledge towards freedom! |
+---ôôô---ôôô--------------------------------------------ôôô---ôôô---+
\O/ \O/ (c)1998-2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] \O/ \O/
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
