On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 the voices made Jeremy Turner write: JT> On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 13:42, Lance W. Haverkamp wrote: JT> > I don't think I'll be using Spamassassin any longer. I can't imagine ANY JT> > spam filter program not catching that email. JT> JT> >From what I've read on this list and on spamassassin.org, SpamAssassin JT> is not trained to catch specific email, but to be a good defense against JT> all kinds of spam. Therefore evaluating the worth of SpamAssassin JT> against this one email isn't a good assumption. I did, however, read JT> that you tried several emails with it. SpamAssassin seems to need JT> tuning. I am looking forward to Bayes in 2.50. This will help train JT> individual filtering sites with identifying spam, adult content, or JT> whatever!
Getting such bad results as he did is either just the dark side of statistics (ie bad luck) or there was something wrong with this installation; or he used like 4 e-mails only, which got a lower score simply because he sent them himself (which, of course, changes the headers). -- /\___/\ /\___/\ \_@ @_/ \_@ @_/ +--oOO-(_)-OOo------------------------------------------oOO-(_)-OOo--+ | Per scientiam ad libertatem! // Through knowledge towards freedom! | +---ôôô---ôôô--------------------------------------------ôôô---ôôô---+ \O/ \O/ (c)1998-2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] \O/ \O/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk