-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Tuesday, November 4, 2003, 6:11:18 AM, Colin responded to Carlos Jorge:

CAB> That all depends on how you are calling SA. If you are using
CAB> procmail, as I and many others are, you could right a simple
CAB> procmail recipe that checked for the presence of  "X-Spam-Status"
CAB> and if it wasn't there, passed it to SA.

It might be useful to have a user_prefs option in a future version of SA
which says how we want pre-scanned emails handled.

* If "X-Spam-Flag: YES", then some other site believes this is spam. Do I
  trust that other (unknown) site?
  a) If I'm really aggressive, then yes, if ANY site upstream from me
     flagged an email as spam, then treat it as spam. Do not bother doing
     any additional analysis.
  b) No, I don't trust that other site. Remove any/all SA headers,
     recover the original email if set aside into an attachment, and then
     retest using MY rules.

* If some previous site claims not spam, then still the same two options
  should be available. And if anyone wants to trust the score from that
  previous site, I still have a slightly used bridge in Brooklyn
  available for sale...

Bob Menschel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0

iQA/AwUBP6hj1pebK8E4qh1HEQIkfwCfVp0TDTGejotJaXEv3J2kti8xiakAoOrq
0MQxcqJkHyis4XHc3XmMnrad
=WBnn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to