I wasn't even aware that this notfirsthop argument existed; as far as I
can
tell in a few minutes of testing, the argument has no effect.
I've had to disable all dynamic-IP RBLs because of this problem...
Out of curiosity, what method do you use to feed your email into
SpamAssassin? Do you
At 03:10 PM 10/16/2003, Daniel M. Drucker wrote:
I wasn't even aware that this notfirsthop argument existed; as far as
I can tell in a few minutes of testing, the argument has no effect.
I've had to disable all dynamic-IP RBLs because of this problem...
Dan.. Are you using an internal
* Daniel M. Drucker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-10-18 09:38]:
Is there a way to discover what SA currently treats as trusted?
Yes, running with debug (-D) switch turn on.
Received.pm:
dbg (received-header: relay .$relay-{ip}. trusted? .
($in_trusted ? yes : no));
Dominik
On 2003-10-16, Brian Sneddon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you check the rule itself in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf you'll notice the
-notfirsthop part of the argument to check_rbl_txt(). This tells
SpamAssassin to check all hops except the first one for this match. As
a
I wasn't even aware that
On 2003-10-16, Brian Sneddon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you check the rule itself in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf you'll notice the
-notfirsthop part of the argument to check_rbl_txt(). This tells
SpamAssassin to check all hops except the first one for this match. As a
I wasn't even aware that this
] Re: RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK
On 2003-10-16, Brian Sneddon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you check the rule itself in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf you'll notice the
-notfirsthop part of the argument to check_rbl_txt(). This tells
SpamAssassin to check all hops except the first one for this match.
As a
I
At 03:10 PM 10/16/2003, Daniel M. Drucker wrote:
I wasn't even aware that this notfirsthop argument existed; as far as
I can tell in a few minutes of testing, the argument has no effect.
I've had to disable all dynamic-IP RBLs because of this problem...
Dan.. Are you using an internal mailserver
