On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 10:35:49PM -0600, dman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 08:02:47PM -0800, Scott Doty wrote:
> | On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 07:09:13PM -0800, Kevin Cosgrove wrote:
> | > The "broken" recipe looks like this:
> | [...]
> | > # Tag spam, pass non-spam untouched.
> | > :0fw
> | >
On 30 March 2002 at 4:51, "Tony L. Svanstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # File a copy of the spam.
> :0:
> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> spamspool
tls> This won't file a _copy_ of the spam, it will file the spam
tls> and then sto= p; if you really want a copy of it (ie that
tls> the filtering wil
On 29 March 2002 at 20:02, Scott Doty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # Tag spam, pass non-spam untouched.
> :0fw
> | /home/kevinc/bin/spamc -p 7783
Add a "-f" (filter) to spamc so it passes the message along in
your .procmailrc.
-Scott
I just tried that. No difference. Any more idea
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 08:02:47PM -0800, Scott Doty wrote:
| On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 07:09:13PM -0800, Kevin Cosgrove wrote:
| > The "broken" recipe looks like this:
| [...]
| > # Tag spam, pass non-spam untouched.
| > :0fw
| > | /home/kevinc/bin/spamc -p 7783
|
| Add a "-f" (filter) to spam
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 07:09:13PM -0800, Kevin Cosgrove wrote:
> The "broken" recipe looks like this:
[...]
> # Tag spam, pass non-spam untouched.
> :0fw
> | /home/kevinc/bin/spamc -p 7783
Add a "-f" (filter) to spamc so it passes the message along in
your .procmailrc.
-Scott
__
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 the voices made Kevin Cosgrove write:
> The "broken" recipe looks like this:
Since you didn't quote the problem (and I don't remember it) I'll just point
out a thing or two anyways...
> # File a copy of the spam.
> :0:
> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> spamspool
This won't
On 29 March 2002 at 21:34, Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What do those procmail recipes look like?
The "broken" recipe looks like this:
MAILDIR=/home/kevinc/Mail
# DROPPRIVS=yes
LOGFILE=/home/kevinc/var/log/procmail
VERBOSE=yes
# Tag spam, pass non-spam untouched.
:0fw
| /
Kevin Cosgrove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What could be wrong here folks?
What do those procmail recipes look like?
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
A day without fusion is like a day without sunshine.
___
Spamassassi
