Would a rule that adds points for no pingable web site for a domain
be useful? If spam comes in from [EMAIL PROTECTED], could
http://www.example.com be tested? If you get a 404 or no response,
give the message a couple points. Just an idea, Mike
--
Michael Clark, Webmaster
Center for Democrac
--On Wednesday, August 13, 2003 7:12 PM -0400 Chris Trudeau-Personal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bad idea...there are lots of sites out there that block ICMP and that
don't have related "www" sites.
CT
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Would a rule that ad
Michael Clark writes:
> Would a rule that adds points for no pingable web site for a domain
> be useful? If spam comes in from [EMAIL PROTECTED], could
> http://www.example.com be tested? If you get a 404 or no response,
> give the message a couple points. Just an idea, Mike
Probably not
I'd immediately disable a rule like this. Many sites either have no
website (such as the domain I use at home), or don't allow ICMP through
to their webservers (like the domain I use at work). You'd probably get
FPs on mail from me no matter where I sent it from.
Michael Clark wrote:
Would a
Bad idea...there are lots of sites out there that block ICMP and that don't
have related "www" sites.
CT
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:51 PM
Subject: [SA
