With all this talk of SA stalling, I decided to go ahead and post an idea
that a friend of mine posed to me a couple days ago. I don't think he is
interested in posting to the list, but he hates spam as much as I do.
The idea is to do something like the "CodeRed" tarpit (labrea, heh) did for
infe
On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 01:28, Carl E. Mankinen wrote:
> With all this talk of SA stalling, I decided to go ahead and post an idea
> that a friend of mine posed to me a couple days ago. I don't think he is
> interested in posting to the list, but he hates spam as much as I do.
>
> The idea is to do
I heard of a similar idea a while back. The nice thing about it is that
it avoided all possible legal problems. It also consumed some resources
on your MTA but it is surely doable. The trick was that as soon as you've
identified that the message is spam during you MTA's conversation, slow
the c
e development activity and might be
someplace one might be able to lay the proposal on the table.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:04 PM
To: Carl E. Mankinen
Cc: SA Talk
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SA feature/idea?
I heard o
Robert Strickler wrote:
> Search the recent archive for teergrubing, (I called it a spambump, like a
> speedbump in a parking lot). Basically you send continuation messages every
> 15-60 seconds, a perfectly legitimate RFC, you just keep it up until you or
> the other side gives up.
>
One thoug
s well (2-4 MB of swap, 1-2 MB
of RAM)
a hefty tax, I assume from forking sendmail.
-Original Message-
From: Rich Puhek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:04 PM
To: Robert Strickler
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Carl E. Mankinen; SA Talk
Subject: Re: [SAtalk]
