RE: [SAtalk] SA missed an 'invisible font'?

2004-01-22 Thread Larry Gilson
] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SA missed an 'invisible font'? Hello Charles, Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 8:14:50 AM, you wrote: CG Example HTML below. SA seems to have not recognized the EE font as CG 'invisible', perhaps because it is just one or two points outside the CG 'range' permitted by SA

Re: [SAtalk] SA missed an 'invisible font'?

2004-01-22 Thread Brent J. Nordquist
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Robert Menschel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sounds like a good idea. I built and tested the following: rawbody RM_rbh_0ptFont /font-size: 0pt;/i describe RM_rbh_0ptFont HTML includes zero-point font size; invisible text scoreRM_rbh_0ptFont 1.00 Suggested

Re[2]: [SAtalk] SA missed an 'invisible font'?

2004-01-22 Thread Robert Menschel
Hello Larry, Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 11:37:09 PM, you wrote: LG Along the same lines, I had the following: LG describe MY_RBDY_INVTXTSZ1 MY: Invisible text size LG rawbody MY_RBDY_INVTXTSZ1 /font\s+.*\bsize=.-\d\D/i LG scoreMY_RBDY_INVTXTSZ1 0.5 LG describe MY_RBDY_INVTXTSZ2 MY:

Re: [SAtalk] SA missed an 'invisible font'?

2004-01-22 Thread Scott Lambert
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 02:37:09AM -0500, Larry Gilson wrote: Hi Bob, Along the same lines, I had the following: describe MY_RBDY_INVTXTSZ1 MY: Invisible text size rawbody MY_RBDY_INVTXTSZ1 /font\s+.*\bsize=.-\d\D/i scoreMY_RBDY_INVTXTSZ1 0.5 I have something similar. The style

FW: Re[2]: [SAtalk] SA missed an 'invisible font'?

2004-01-22 Thread Larry Gilson
-Original Message- From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 8:13 PM To: Larry Gilson Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) Subject: Re[2]: [SAtalk] SA missed an 'invisible font'? Hello Larry, Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 11:37:09 PM, you wrote

RE: [SAtalk] SA missed an 'invisible font'?

2004-01-22 Thread Larry Gilson
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:spamassassin-talk- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Lambert Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 9:54 AM To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SA missed an 'invisible font'? On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 02:37:09AM -0500

[SAtalk] SA missed an 'invisible font'?

2004-01-21 Thread Charles Gregory
X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=3.5 autolearn=no tests=HTML_20_30=0.474, HTML_FONT_BIG=0.1,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,LOC_LOWPRICE=0.9, LOC_WEIGHTPATCH=1,RCVD_IN_NJABL=0.1,RCVD_IN_SORBS=0.1 Example HTML below. SA seems to have not recognized the EE font as

Re: [SAtalk] SA missed an 'invisible font'?

2004-01-21 Thread Robert Menschel
Hello Charles, Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 8:14:50 AM, you wrote: CG Example HTML below. SA seems to have not recognized the EE font as CG 'invisible', perhaps because it is just one or two points outside the CG 'range' permitted by SA? But also note that they have used a ZERO point CG size