At 05:53 PM 9/29/03 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I'm using spamc/spamd. AFAIK, the message is small so I don't think
it's hitting the maximum scan limit. I'm running RH 7.3 with Sendmail
8.11.6-27 along with SA 2.60 and Razor 2.36. I'm calling SA from
/etc/procmailrc with:
Are you sure i
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 01:16 PM 9/28/03 -0700, Henry Kwan wrote:
> >I've noticed that after upgrading to 2.60, a few spams are slipping through
> >without being analyzed. Not a lot, probably only one in a few hundred, but
> >it's a bit of a head scratcher. Anyone have any
At 01:16 PM 9/28/03 -0700, Henry Kwan wrote:
I've noticed that after upgrading to 2.60, a few spams are slipping through
without being analyzed. Not a lot, probably only one in a few hundred, but
it's a bit of a head scratcher. Anyone have any ideas?
Do you use spamc/spamd? if so, is the message
>
> I've noticed that after upgrading to 2.60, a few spams are
> slipping through
> without being analyzed. Not a lot, probably only one in a
Message size exceeds Spamassassin max threshold?
> few hundred, but
> it's a bit of a head scratcher. Anyone have any ideas?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Here'
Hi,
I've noticed that after upgrading to 2.60, a few spams are slipping through
without being analyzed. Not a lot, probably only one in a few hundred, but
it's a bit of a head scratcher. Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks.
Here's the header of such a message:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rec
