Craig Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:27 AM
To: Scott Walde
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Suggestion for CALL_888
I don't think 866, 855, 844, etc are toll free numbers. 877, 888 and
800 are it AFAIK. Does make sense to add 877 to the 888 rule t
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 09:36:01AM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote:
| On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 09:04, Scott Walde wrote:
| > Please also notice: I'm looking for either '-'es or ' 'es in the phone
| > number as the spam I got was in the format 1 877 555 1212 not
| > 1-877-555-1212. Might we also want to l
I'll just call it .
C
On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 09:04, Scott Walde wrote:
> On 4 Feb 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
>
> > Yeah, I just looked it up online:
>
> Sorry, hit send before I saw this.
>
> > I'll cover all of those prefixes in a single rule and rescore with the
> > GA.
>
> Please also notic
On 4 Feb 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Yeah, I just looked it up online:
Sorry, hit send before I saw this.
> I'll cover all of those prefixes in a single rule and rescore with the
> GA.
Please also notice: I'm looking for either '-'es or ' 'es in the phone
number as the spam I got was in the fo
On 4 Feb 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
> I don't think 866, 855, 844, etc are toll free numbers. 877, 888 and
> 800 are it AFAIK. Does make sense to add 877 to the 888 rule though,
> and to make the - into a [\-\s]
I made a mistake. 811 is reserved for special use. The others are all
reserved or
> I don't think 866, 855, 844, etc are toll free numbers. 877, 888 and
> 800 are it AFAIK. Does make sense to add 877 to the 888 rule though,
> and to make the - into a [\-\s]
866 is a toll-free area code.
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk maili
Yeah, I just looked it up online:
What is a Toll Free Number?
This probably seems a little basic, but a toll free number is a
telephone number that can be called at no cost to the caller, because
the recipient pays for the cost of the call. Also referred to as 800
numbers after the origina
At 08:27 AM 2/4/2002 -0800, Craig Hughes wrote:
>I don't think 866, 855, 844, etc are toll free numbers. 877, 888 and
>800 are it AFAIK. Does make sense to add 877 to the 888 rule though,
>and to make the - into a [\-\s]
866 *is* toll free in the USA, just like 800, 888, 877.
reb
___
I don't think 866, 855, 844, etc are toll free numbers. 877, 888 and
800 are it AFAIK. Does make sense to add 877 to the 888 rule though,
and to make the - into a [\-\s]
C
On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 07:59, Scott Walde wrote:
> The following one got through. I changed CALL_888 to:
>
> body CALL_8
The following one got through. I changed CALL_888 to:
body CALL_888
/(?:call|dial).{1,15}8(?:88|77|66|55|44|33|22|11)[\-\s][\dA-Z]+[\-\s]?[\dA-Z]+/i
(I suppose I could add '00' and lose the CALL_1_800 test, but 1-800 is
scored higher than 888.)
and it triggers now. The message still only sco
10 matches
Mail list logo
