Kandji Développeur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The story :
linux RedHat 7.3 - kernel 2.4.18#3 on smp system (2xPII)
perl 5.6.1
spamassassin version 2.55
postfix 1.1.12-0.7
1) The system had been running for 90 days.
2) I installed spamassassin AND pop-before-smtp the same day
3) The system
Thanks for the info, I've just upgraded my development server to 2.4.22.. It seems to
work like a charm...
Any further advice about this kernel too ??
Thanks
On 4 Sep 2003 at 14:18, Nick Leverton wrote:
Kandji Développeur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The story :
linux RedHat 7.3 - kernel
described here.
-Original Message-
From: Kandji Développeur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 10:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] System goes down
Hello,
I've been using spamassassin for 2 weeks and it (*seems*) that it caused my system to
go down
At 15:18 2/09/2003 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, Sendmail 8.12.9 (and possibly prior versions) supports a limit:
define(`confMAX_DAEMON_CHILDREN', `24')dnl
All that does is limits the number of simultanous children the main
sendmail process will launch in response to incomming
At 19:26 2/09/2003 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
Folks -- are you using the -m switch to limit how many spamds can run?
If you don't use that, and you're using an MTA that also does not limit
concurrent local delivery commands, like sendmail, this will be an issue.
Try the -m switch.
On some setups
Hello,
I've been using spamassassin for 2 weeks and it (*seems*) that it caused my system to go down...
The story :
linux RedHat 7.3 - kernel 2.4.18#3 on smp system (2xPII)
perl 5.6.1
spamassassin version 2.55
postfix 1.1.12-0.7
1) The system had been running for 90 days.
2) I installed
You might be experiencing hardware problems that only occur under load.
SA/spamd uses a lot
of cpu and memory cycles. If it runs long enough, on large messages, it might
push the cpu
past its operating range temperature, if for example, the system cooling is
marginal. Likewise,
marginal memory
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 04:04:45PM +0200, Kandji Développeur wrote:
Hello,
I've been using spamassassin for 2 weeks and it (*seems*) that it caused my system
to go down...
The story :
linux RedHat 7.3 - kernel 2.4.18#3 on smp system (2xPII)
perl 5.6.1
spamassassin version 2.55
Here is the output of 'ps auxw' at the moment the
machine did hang.
What immedeately catches the eye is the large number of
/usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/spamd -d -u nobody
processes.
I thought that there should only ONE spamd be running?
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME
Folks -- are you using the -m switch to limit how many spamds can run?
If you don't use that, and you're using an MTA that also does not limit
concurrent local delivery commands, like sendmail, this will be an issue.
Try the -m switch.
--j.
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Carlo Wood wrote:
Here is the output of 'ps auxw' at the moment the
machine did hang.
What immedeately catches the eye is the large number of
/usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/spamd -d -u nobody
processes.
I think you should have a single spamd listed and the many perl
]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc:
ceforge.net Subject: Re: [SAtalk]
System goes down
Your system is being killed by Linux's OOM killer. The OOM killer in 2.4
series doesn't appear to be all that bright and I have had it kill init in
the past which results in what you describe (pings but services down).
You basically have two options, either add more memory or limit the number
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 07:26:02PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
Folks -- are you using the -m switch to limit how many spamds can run?
If you don't use that, and you're using an MTA that also does not limit
concurrent local delivery commands, like sendmail, this will be an issue.
Try the -m
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:47:02PM -0600, Brian Godette wrote:
Your system is being killed by Linux's OOM killer. The OOM killer in 2.4
series doesn't appear to be all that bright and I have had it kill init in
the past which results in what you describe (pings but services down).
You
At 03:18 PM 9.2.2003 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, Sendmail 8.12.9 (and possibly prior versions) supports a limit:
define(`confMAX_DAEMON_CHILDREN', `24')dnl
Tony Nelson
Tony, how does one arrive at the limit '24'.?
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
Sage American
16 matches
Mail list logo