Re: [SAtalk] URI Rules

2004-01-20 Thread Robert Menschel
Hello Dan, Tuesday, January 20, 2004, 9:31:28 AM, you wrote: DK> How efficient are URI rules? I am probably going to have several hundred DK> of these rules, and I'm wondering if that will cause a problem. I'm DK> guessing I will have between 300 and 600 rules. Is anyone else running DK> this man

Re: [SAtalk] URI Rules

2004-01-20 Thread Kelson Vibber
At 09:31 AM 1/20/2004, Dan Kennedy wrote: The rules won't have any wildcards, just basically a big blacklist of URLs found in SPAM. You might want to look into Chris Santerre's "BigEvil" ruleset before you reinvent the wheel: http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm Kelson Vi

Re: [SAtalk] URI Rules

2004-01-20 Thread Matt Kettler
sounds like you're making your own version of bigevil.cf. Chris S found that memory usage was greatly reduced by using regex combos to reduce the number of rules. At 12:31 PM 1/20/2004, Dan Kennedy wrote: How efficient are URI rules? I am probably going to have several hundred of these rules, an

[SAtalk] URI Rules

2004-01-20 Thread Dan Kennedy
How efficient are URI rules? I am probably going to have several hundred of these rules, and I'm wondering if that will cause a problem. I'm guessing I will have between 300 and 600 rules. Is anyone else running this many URI rules? And does it cause any big performance issues? The rules won't hav