Hello All,
Here is a question that might seem easy to most. I am running spamassassin 2.60 and
would like to
upgrade to 2.63. What are some of the issues that I have to be aware of? I am fairly
new to
spamassassin and I would like a seemless upgrade to ensure that I do not ruin the
current
I've hit a problem upgrading to 2.61... (on RedHat 8)
I think the root of the problem is that having installed 2.60 I then
proceeded to install Razor2. Instead of installing the razor-agents-sdk
package, I tried installing the Perl modules from CPAN:. When this failed,
due to perl dependency error
> > - Our users probably are not going to be able to feed spam/ham into the
> > learning system in SA manually. Based on this, would you recommend turning
> > on auto bayes learning per user, or leave it off as we did in 2.55?
>
> Its should general improves results, so if you have the resources
Rob Mangiafico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We have been running SA 2.55 for quite some time for a large user base
> without Bayes support. It has worked great, but as of late, more and more
> spam is getting through (as expected) and we are looking to upgrade to
> 2.60. A few questions:
>
>
We have been running SA 2.55 for quite some time for a large user base
without Bayes support. It has worked great, but as of late, more and more
spam is getting through (as expected) and we are looking to upgrade to
2.60. A few questions:
- Our users probably are not going to be able to feed sp
Yusuf Goolamabbas wrote:
Hi, I want to upgrade from SA 2.53 to 2.60. It's very likely that some
rules may have been added/deleted. I have modified some scores in my
local.cf
What happens if rules corresponding to the modified scores no longer
exist in SA 2.60 ?
Nothing will happen... You'll ju
Hi, I want to upgrade from SA 2.53 to 2.60. It's very likely that some
rules may have been added/deleted. I have modified some scores in my
local.cf
What happens if rules corresponding to the modified scores no longer
exist in SA 2.60 ?
If I am not using Bayes, any gotchas in upgrading from 2.53
Hi. I'm currently running SA-2.53, and thinking of upgrading to 2.55. Since
this is a production system I'm running on (and I don't have a spare
machine to test on), I was wondering if anyone had any experience with the
upgrade from one to the other. Is it a fairly painless process? Are there
a
Hey all. Sorry if this was covered recently, but I just got back on
the list (too many high volume lists aren't good when you go on
vacation).
I've been running 2.53 with pretty good success - very good, in fact,
but I'm getting ready to upgrade to 2.55. Are there any gotchas that
anyone knows o
On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 10:43, Paul Hutchings wrote:
> early days I appreciate, but anyone?
>
> regards
> Paul
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Paul Hutchings
> > Sent: 04 April 2003 08:34
> > To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> > Subject:
Nicholas Chua wrote on Wed, 12 Mar 2003 02:07:40 +0800:
> Mail::SpamAssassin is up to date.
Which is correct.
>
> How can I update without installing the tarball?
>
There's only CVS versions you could update to, so that's the only way
to do it.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your
sabat said:
> Since the 2.50 release is impending, can someone on the inside briefly
> explain where the new Bayesian stuff stores what it "learns," and how
> would this affect those of us running multiple mail servers? I notice
> Theo mentioned something about the developers mulling over using
Since the 2.50 release is impending, can someone on the inside briefly
explain where the new Bayesian stuff stores what it "learns," and how
would this affect those of us running multiple mail servers? I notice
Theo mentioned something about the developers mulling over using a
database -- any
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 09:17:25PM -0800, JP Kelly wrote:
> I am runningv2.43 and I am looking forward to upgrading to 2.5.
> I am running it on OS X with exim.
> I would like to upgrade via CPAN.
> What is the likelihood of the upgrade breaking my configuration?
> How different is 2.5 from 2.43.
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, JP Kelly wrote:
> I am runningv2.43 and I am looking forward to upgrading to 2.5.
> I am running it on OS X with exim.
> I would like to upgrade via CPAN.
> What is the likelihood of the upgrade breaking my configuration?
> How different is 2.5 from 2.43.
Assuming you store y
I am runningv2.43 and I am looking forward to upgrading to 2.5.
I am running it on OS X with exim.
I would like to upgrade via CPAN.
What is the likelihood of the upgrade breaking my configuration?
How different is 2.5 from 2.43.
---
This SF.NE
assassin-talk-admin@;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of
> Michael Clark
> Sent: 17 October 2002 16:44
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Upgrading from 2.11 to 2.42
>
>
> I need to upgrade a few mail servers copies of SpamAssassin from 2.11
> to 2.42 (and one from 2.01). Shoul
I need to upgrade a few mail servers copies of SpamAssassin from 2.11
to 2.42 (and one from 2.01). Should I delete the ancient existing
copy, and then install, or simply install 2.42 per the standard
instructions? The old versions are working fine. Thanks, Michael
--
Michael Clark, Webmaster
I am still using SA 2.01. There was much talk here about version 2.2+ using
excessive CPU loads. Have those problems been fixed by now?
I really am thinking of upgrading, as I want the SQL interface.
Thanks.
- Mark
System Administrator Asarian-host.org
---
"If you were supposed to und
yup caught that and have it up and running ... very nice, thanks :)
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
> On 2/28/02 4:57 AM, "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > 'K, removed the version from ports I had installed earlier, and did a
> > rebuild and install:
> >
> > earth
On 2/27/02 10:20 AM, "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> earth# /usr/bin/spamproxyd localhost:10025 localhost:10026
> Failed to run A_FROM_IN_AUTO_WLIST SpamAssassin test, skipping:
> (Can't locate object method "check_for_auto_whitelist" via package
> "Mail::SpamAssassin::Pe
On 2/28/02 4:57 AM, "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 'K, removed the version from ports I had installed earlier, and did a
> rebuild and install:
>
> earth# /usr/bin/spamproxyd
> Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/MyMailAudit.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
> /usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/m
idn't upgrade right -- you're still picking up an old .cf file.
>
> C
>
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 14:20:51 -0400 (AST)
> > From: Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [SAtalk] U
You didn't upgrade right -- you're still picking up an old .cf file.
C
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 14:20:51 -0400 (AST)
> From: Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Upgrading to spamproxyd in v2.1 ..
Something that didn't get into the tar file? *raised eyebrow*
grep check_for * | sort
EvalTests.pm:sub check_for_bad_dialup_ips {
EvalTests.pm:sub check_for_bad_helo {
EvalTests.pm:sub check_for_base64_enc_text {
EvalTests.pm:sub check_for_content_type_just_html {
EvalTests.pm:sub check_for_fa
Ya, but looking at the code, this doesn't even appear to be related to the
proxyd itself:(
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Ian R. Justman wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> >
> > earth# /usr/bin/spamproxyd localhost:10025 localhost:10026
> > Failed to run A_FROM_IN_AUTO_WLIST S
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> earth# /usr/bin/spamproxyd localhost:10025 localhost:10026
> Failed to run A_FROM_IN_AUTO_WLIST SpamAssassin test, skipping:
> (Can't locate object method "check_for_auto_whitelist" via package
>"Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at
>/u
earth# /usr/bin/spamproxyd localhost:10025 localhost:10026
Failed to run A_FROM_IN_AUTO_WLIST SpamAssassin test, skipping:
(Can't locate object method "check_for_auto_whitelist" via package
"Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerM
MAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Upgrading
>
> Forgive me if this in the README, I didn't see anything on it, but what
> is the procedure for upgrading? Do I just do a perl Makefile.PL && make
> && make test && make in
Forgive me if this in the README, I didn’t see
anything on it, but what is the procedure for upgrading? Do I just do a perl Makefile.PL &&
make && make test && make install and then just replace the old
spamc and spamd daemons with the new ones?
What about my /etc/mail/local.cf will that
30 matches
Mail list logo
