On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 07:51:00AM +0300, Abigail Marshall wrote:
This spam had a 0 score, SA 2.54... wondering how it got
through - it is full of lots of words about weight loss and
all caps words like GUARANTEED, FREE - no HTML though, just
plain text:
Sneaky spam. Start using bayes or
Hello Ross,
Wednesday, July 2, 2003, 8:26:43 AM, you wrote:
RV On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 09:51:24PM -0700, Abigail Marshall wrote:
Subject: Why are so many people losing weight on Atkins?
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0
tests=none
version=2.54
X-Spam-Level:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Abigail,
Tuesday, July 1, 2003, 9:51:24 PM, you wrote:
AM This spam had a 0 score, SA 2.54... wondering how it got
AM through - it is full of lots of words about weight loss and
AM all caps words like GUARANTEED, FREE - no HTML though, just
AM
Hello Robert,
Wednesday, July 2, 2003, 6:16:03 PM, you wrote:
AM This spam had a 0 score, SA 2.54... wondering how it got
AM through - it is full of lots of words about weight loss and
AM all caps words like GUARANTEED, FREE - no HTML though, just
AM plain text:
RM It scored 6.2 here,
Hello Robert,
RM Ah, but you see, I didn't test your message -- I tested an identical
RM message that reached me here directly from the spammer
RM The email I received here was both text and html. The HTML was
RM effectively empty -- it had the following tags: html, head, title, /title
RM (null
This spam had a 0 score, SA 2.54... wondering how it got
through - it is full of lots of words about weight loss and
all caps words like GUARANTEED, FREE - no HTML though, just
plain text:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from b6.e-i1.com (b6.e-i1.com [63.251.54.86])
by [domain]
