RE: [SAtalk] auto learn is ALWAYS no

2003-11-17 Thread Thomas Kinghorn
disregard the last mail. trashed the bayes tokens etc and rebuilt SA. Working now. Thanks all > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Kinghorn > Sent: 17 November 2003 08:34 > To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] auto learn is ALWAYS no > > > Hi

RE: [SAtalk] auto learn is ALWAYS no

2003-11-17 Thread Thomas Kinghorn
in-Talk (E-mail) > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] auto learn is ALWAYS no > > > At 07:32 AM 11/14/03 +0200, Thomas Kinghorn wrote: > >I am a little confused as to what triggers the autolearn function. > > > For autolearning purposes, a second score for the email is > calculated.

Re: [SAtalk] auto learn is ALWAYS no

2003-11-14 Thread Matt Kettler
At 07:32 AM 11/14/03 +0200, Thomas Kinghorn wrote: I am a little confused as to what triggers the autolearn function. For autolearning purposes, a second score for the email is calculated. This score is calculated as if bayes were disabled. ie: bayes rules don't count, and the appropriate non-b

Re: [SAtalk] auto learn is ALWAYS no

2003-11-14 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 07:32:59AM +0200, Thomas Kinghorn wrote: > I am a little confused as to what triggers the autolearn function. Read the docs, it's in there. If you're not getting autolearning, you may need to adjust your autolearn settings. But read the docs, it'll help you out. -- Rand

[SAtalk] auto learn is ALWAYS no

2003-11-13 Thread Thomas Kinghorn
Hi List. I am getting alot more junk mail since upgrading to 2.60, but thats not the point. Why does autolearn always reflect no? autolearn=no version=2.60 I am a little confused as to what triggers the autolearn function. Many thanks Regards, Tom Kinghorn -