At 11:59 AM 1/30/2004, PieterB wrote:
Shouldn't a message that is identified as spam by the bayesian
filter of spamassassin (BAYES_90 or BAYES_99 in my case) never be
used as a message that is learned as ham? (I would expect it
not to be used for learning because it wouldn't improve the
Can somebody explain me why a spammessage gets learned as ham?
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE
autolearn=ham version=2.60
Pieter
8--
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 25 00:18:38 2004
Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] by
A bug in 2.6 caused messages which hit BAYES_99 to be learned as ham, this
has been fixed, you should upgrade.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
http://www.i-is.com/
PieterB wrote:
Can somebody explain me why a spammessage gets learned as ham?
X-Spam-Status: Yes,
Shouldn't a message that is identified as spam by the bayesian
filter of spamassassin (BAYES_90 or BAYES_99 in my case) never be
used as a message that is learned as ham? (I would expect it
not to be used for learning because it wouldn't improve the
bayesfilter, and training it as ham makes the
At 11:51 AM 1/30/2004, Fred wrote:
A bug in 2.6 caused messages which hit BAYES_99 to be learned as ham, this
has been fixed, you should upgrade.
For reference, there was no bug per se. The fact that the message hit
BAYES_99 did not cause it to be learned as ham.
However, newer versions of
[THIS LIST HAS MOVED! see http://useast.spamassassin.org/lists.html .]
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 13:08:58 +0100 PieterB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can somebody explain me why a spammessage gets learned as ham?
Dunno. Why are you running the message through SpamAssassin twice?
-- Bob
X-Spam-Status:
