At 08:10 AM 1/28/04 +0200, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
My spamd is running as xadmin
xadmin 17057 1 0 Jan27 ?00:00:22 /usr/bin/perl -T -w
/usr/bin/spamd -d -a -u xadmin
Do I need to run sa-learn as xadmin
If so, I could kick myself, I have been training it while logged in as
root...
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 January 2004 05:55
> To: Thomas Kinghorn; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] bayes question: HAM
>
>
> At 02:10 PM 1/27/04 +0200, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
> >While using spamd -D
At 02:10 PM 1/27/04 +0200, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
While using spamd -D, I can see the messages being learned as ham.
However, while doing a spamassasin -D --lint, it shows only 1 ham.
sa-learn --dump magic shows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] exim]# sa-learn --dump magic
I have attached the --lint debug.
An
;Matt Kettler'; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] bayes question: HAM
Sorry about that.
My spamd is running as xadmin
xadmin 17057 1 0 Jan27 ?00:00:22 /usr/bin/perl -T -w
/usr/bin/spamd -d -a -u xadmin
Do I need to run sa-learn as xadmin
If so, I could kick
Hi List.
While using spamd -D, I can see the messages being learned as ham.
However, while doing a spamassasin -D --lint, it shows only 1 ham.
sa-learn --dump magic shows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] exim]# sa-learn --dump magic
0.000 0 2 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.0
I have a low volume mail server and do not get many spams. In the past 2
months I have only been able to collect 120 spams to feed the bayes. (I have
over 1000 hams in the datatbase.) I would like to enable bayes at this
point. I thought I saw a command to set minimum number of bayes entries
requir
; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Bayes question: Can I change the number of messages
> required before bayes kicks in?
>
>
> I have a low volume mail server and do not get many spams. In
> the past 2
> months I have only been able to collect 120 spams to feed th
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ian Douglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "SpamAssassin list"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 3:05 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] bayes question
> First, run spa
> > debug: debug: Only 86 ham(s) in Bayes DB < 200
>
> There's your answer as to why Bayes isn't scoring for you.
Gotcha, thanks.
-id
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Porta
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, ian douglas wrote:
> > First, run spamassassin -tD > output. Is bayes even enabled? are there enough tokens?
>
> debug: Score set 0 chosen.
> debug: running in taint mode? no
> debug: using "/usr/share/spamassassin" for default rules dir
> debug: using "/etc/mail/spamassassin
> First, run spamassassin -tD output. Is bayes even enabled? are there enough tokens?
debug: Score set 0 chosen.
debug: running in taint mode? no
debug: using "/usr/share/spamassassin" for default rules dir
debug: using "/etc/mail/spamassassin" for site rules dir
debug: using "/root/.spamassassin
At 02:22 PM 7/25/2003 -0700, Ian Douglas wrote:
I've been putting sa-learn through the gears with many thousands of spam
messages (gotta love web hosting 100+ domains most of which do nothing but
collect spam /sigh).
I'm curious how Bayes is *supposed* to be learning... I find that despite
learning
I've been putting sa-learn through the gears with many thousands of spam
messages (gotta love web hosting 100+ domains most of which do nothing but
collect spam /sigh).
I'm curious how Bayes is *supposed* to be learning... I find that despite
learning from hundreds of MB of spam that spam is still
13 matches
Mail list logo
