At 12:37 AM 1/21/04 -0500, Pedro Sam wrote:
My question, should
bayes ignore the habeas headers by default?
Perhaps not by default, but right now it's probably a good idea.
In general, any sudden shift of behavior from something commonly seen only
in nonspam to commonly seen in both causes troubl
Pedro Sam wrote:
I tried to remove the habeas headers mannually
You can get the same results by putting in your preference or
configuration file
bayes_ignore_header X-Habeas-SWE-1
bayes_ignore_header X-Habeas-SWE-2
bayes_ignore_header X-Habeas-SWE-3
bayes_ignore_header X-Habeas-SWE-4
bayes_ignore
Hi all,
I know everyone is sick of hearing about complaints about the habeas fiasco.
(I know I am) But ... a recent habeas spam landed as FN with a score of 4.8.
what's interesting is that it only scored a BAYES_50. That's because the
habeas headers had been learnt as primarily ham so far.
