On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 09:39:17PM -0500, James R. Van Zandt wrote:
> The announcement of Debian 3.0r1 was labeled as spam, with these hits:
>
> Anyway, I'd appreciate your adding this to your "nonspam" corpus.
> (I hope you don't mind the attachment.)
Hrm.
2.43:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 req
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 09:39:17PM -0500, James R. Van Zandt wrote:
>
> The announcement of Debian 3.0r1 was labeled as spam, with these hits:
>
> SPAM: Hit! (2.7 points) BODY: Claims you can be removed from the list
> SPAM: Hit! (2.4 points) BODY: No such thing as a free lunch (2)
> SPAM: Hit!
The announcement of Debian 3.0r1 was labeled as spam, with these hits:
SPAM: Hit! (2.7 points) BODY: Claims you can be removed from the list
SPAM: Hit! (2.4 points) BODY: No such thing as a free lunch (2)
SPAM: Hit! (1.8 points) No MX records for the From: domain
The mentions of "free" had to
Hmm you're report regards SpamAssassin 2.20, a rather old version of SA to
say the least, Using the current release version of spamassassin (2.43) I
get a negative score for this mailing.
In the future, please realize that if you're running an old version of SA,
you should test against a semi-r
