[SAtalk] missed spam?

2004-01-21 Thread Paul Diaguila
Greetings We're seeing lots of the =?iso in the header messages getting through. We have this rule in place: header SUBJECT_ENCODED_MY_TEST Subject:raw =~ /=\?.*\?=/i describe SUBJECT_ENCODED_MY_TEST Subject begins with =? scoreSUBJECT_ENCODED_MY_TEST 5.0 When I try to send a test

Re: [SAtalk] missed spam?

2004-01-21 Thread Matt Kettler
At 10:55 AM 1/21/2004, Paul Diaguila wrote: X-Spam-Score: 1.8 BAYES_30,HTML_60_70,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_02,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY,MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE,OACYS_CONS_6,RM_rb_ANCHOR,RM_rb_BODY,RM_rb_HTML,RM_sl_Parens,SUBJECT_ENCODED_MY_TEST What am I missing? What version of SA are you

[SAtalk] Missed Spam samples

2003-07-09 Thread David Watson
My site has been receiving some odd spam with little to no content, increasing amounts over the last fortnight (2 shown below). Is this something other people are seeing? Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 15:15:09 +0100 Received: from machiavelli.team17.com

RE: [SAtalk] Missed Spam samples

2003-07-09 Thread Chris Santerre
-Original Message- From: David Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 10:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Missed Spam samples My site has been receiving some odd spam with little to no content, increasing amounts over the last fortnight

RE: [SAtalk] Missed Spam samples

2003-07-09 Thread Test, James
, 2003 10:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Missed Spam samples My site has been receiving some odd spam with little to no content, increasing amounts over the last fortnight (2 shown below). Is this something other people are seeing? Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date

[SAtalk] missed Spam in v2.01

2002-01-31 Thread CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
Upgraded to v2.01 and seem to be getting more missed Spam than in v1.5. This one message that I just recieved made it thru. I would have thought that the line of yelling and unsubscribe would have triggered a score but they were missed. Here it is: Return-Path: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [SAtalk] missed Spam in v2.01

2002-01-31 Thread Matt Sergeant
To: Spamassassin-Talk Subject: [SAtalk] missed Spam in v2.01 Upgraded to v2.01 and seem to be getting more missed Spam than in v1.5. This one message that I just recieved made it thru. I would have thought that the line of yelling and unsubscribe would have triggered a score

Re: [SAtalk] missed Spam in v2.01

2002-01-31 Thread Greg Ward
On 31 January 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson said: What puzzles me is that this one should have gotten a LINE OF YELLING and UNSUBSCRIBE. Something appears broken. The LINE_OF_YELLING test is (IMHO) too picky in SA 2.0 (and, I presume, 2.01). See the archive for details. Bottom line,

RE: [SAtalk] missed Spam in v2.01

2002-01-31 Thread CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
The LINE_OF_YELLING test is (IMHO) too picky in SA 2.0 (and, I presume, 2.01). See the archive for details. Bottom line, the line has to be = 45 characters long, and there has to be a YELLING word = 5 chars long = 20 chars from either end. I proposed a couple of lame replacements, most of

Re: [SAtalk] missed Spam in v2.01

2002-01-31 Thread Craig Hughes
'pay off debt' gets only 9 hits in the corpus 'pay off your debt' gets 86 'debt' shows up almost 10,000 times though, so we might want a broader rule 'debt free' shows up 600 times 'pay off.*debt' -- 226 'debt consolidation' -- over 400 We probably should be a little careful, since if someone