--On Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:49 PM -0700 Jill U'Ren
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The institution where I work is currently running SpamAssassin on a Red Hat
> 7.2 box.
I'm using MIMEDefang (a milter) on my 7.2 systems. There's a "recipe" on the
MD website explaining how to discard high-scori
hemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jill
U'Ren
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 5:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] options for spamassassin
All-
The institution where I work is currentl
is is all done thru procmail for me. I'm not
sure how your system is setup to deliver emails. A little more info would be
very helpful.
HTH
Chris Santerre
> -Original Message-
> From: Jill U'Ren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 6:49 PM
&
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 03:49:18PM -0700, Jill U'Ren wrote:
> Would it be possible to immediately "flush" anything that
> scores 8.0 (and higher) while keeping email that scores
> 5.0 - 7.99 tagged as possible spam and still delivered to
> the recipient?
Depends on how exactly your SpamAssassin i
Hi Jill,
I agree with Scott - it is possible but you should really think this
through. If there is a problem letting the end-user make the decision, it
would be better to forward to an administrative account for review. Having
worked for the Department of Education for over three years, I can sa
Jill U'Ren wrote:
Would it be possible to immediately "flush" anything that scores 8.0 (and
higher)
It is possible, but are you sure that you *want* to do that? What if a
legitimate message is discarded? IMHO, it's best to simply tag the
messages and let the end-user make these decisions.
---
All-
The institution where I work is currently running SpamAssassin on a Red Hat
7.2 box. The SysAdmin before me installed it and left it's defaults running
(it's not even the end of my first week yet). I've figured out how to
change the threshold, etc, but my boss came up with an interesting qu
