things are not immediately evident)?
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 12:46 PM
To: Erick Calder
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] report_safe ?
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 12:24:16PM -0800, Erick Calder wrote:
>
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 12:24:16PM -0800, Erick Calder wrote:
> I've recently upgraded to Shriek which comes with 2.44. my user_prefs used
> to include a line like:
> report_safe 0
> in the current docs I find neither any mention of this setting nor an
> alternative... wtf?
report_safe was
I've recently upgraded to Shriek which comes with 2.44. my user_prefs used
to include a line like:
report_safe 0
but now I get an error like this:
> Dec 3 23:40:45 beowulf spamd[13358]: debug: Failed to parse line in
> SpamAssassin configuration, skipping: report_safe 0
in the current
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 11:02:19AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> so basically if i do report_safe > 0, and the message is text/plain and
> found to be spam, there is no way of keeping the message in tact without
> attachment?
As I said, there are two options: add headers to the message, or
encap
so basically if i do report_safe > 0, and the message is text/plain and
found to be spam, there is no way of keeping the message in tact without
attachment?
adam
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 10:38, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:17:46AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> > Is there a
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:17:46AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> Is there a way to use report_safe 2 simply to "defang mime" spam
> emails and not attach them all? I thought this was something that could
> be controlled but i cant seem to get it to do so.
There is no "defang" ability anymore i
Hello,
I am having an issue with the behavior of report_safe 2. I would only
like "unsafe" emails to be attached if spam is detected (non text/plain
MIME type). However it seems that report_safe 2 attaches _ALL_ spam
emails, and then in addition to the spam report, creates an
unsafe_report if t
just to update my previous post, text/plain messages are appearing in
the orginal email, but all the headers are showing up in the email body
as well. Is this supposed to happen? I just want to be able "defang"
emails if necessary, otherwise leave text/plain messages untouched.. is
this possible t
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 09:47, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:06:28AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> > shouldnt the original from be preserved up top?
>
> If there was a from in the original, it should be in the encapsulated
> message. Feel free to open a bugzilla ticket, and a
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 09:47, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:06:28AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> > shouldnt the original from be preserved up top?
>
> If there was a from in the original, it should be in the encapsulated
> message. Feel free to open a bugzilla ticket, and a
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:06:28AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> shouldnt the original from be preserved up top?
If there was a from in the original, it should be in the encapsulated
message. Feel free to open a bugzilla ticket, and attach (not cut +
paste) the message to the ticket.
--
Random
wierd.. i dont seen any headers being preserved. This is the very top
of one of my rewritten spam emails.
Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] by nymx1.domain.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--=_3FC2CB65.290EBCFE"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11:14:48PM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> well i would think it at least preserves the From field no? The from
> field seems to be getting whacked whenever there is a spam message with
> report_safe 2
The From field should be, yes. For the listing of headers that are
co
well i would think it at least preserves the From field no? The from
field seems to be getting whacked whenever there is a spam message with
report_safe 2
am i missing something?
On Nov 24, 2003, at 11:06 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:19:31PM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrot
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:19:31PM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> however, i also notice that report_safe seems to be removing (or not
> preserving) the headers when the message gets re-written. The headers
> in the report are correct (bottom part of the message), however they
> dont appear in
ok scratch this, appears every message with report_safe > 0 does this.
thats fine.
however, i also notice that report_safe seems to be removing (or not
preserving) the headers when the message gets re-written. The headers
in the report are correct (bottom part of the message), however they
Hey,
I have 2.55 and 2.60 running. I would like to use report_safe 2, to
attach any "mime dangerous" spam messages. This seems to work in 2.55,
however in 2.6, every spam message appears to be getting attached as an
attachment with the message saying "Spam software has detected".
Shoul
Hi there,
I'm pretty sure this has already been discussed here, but I can't find
anything appropriate in the mail archives... :-(
I've just received a message (erroneously) tagged as spam by my
SpamAssassin installation (SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp)).
When I tried to open this mess
18 matches
Mail list logo
