-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Saturday, August 2, 2003, 3:21:04 PM, Martin wrote:
MR> There's another problem. If you introduce new rules, you have to
MR> give them scores. Because of the way the scoring is done, it's very
MR> time consuming and extremely processor intensive. I
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Raul
> Dias
> Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 2:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] separate rules from distribution
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Em S?, 2003
At Sat Aug 2 22:16:43 2003, Raul Dias wrote:
> > How about separating the rules from the SpamAssassin distribution
> > itself, and offer them as a separate package? This would be similar to
> > the way intrusion detection systems (Snort, etc.) and antivirus
> > applications work.
>
> I think thi
On Saturday, Aug 2, 2003, at 14:16 US/Pacific, Raul Dias wrote:
Hi,
Em S?, 2003-08-02 às 16:49, Florin Andrei escreveu:
How about separating the rules from the SpamAssassin distribution
itself, and offer them as a separate package? This would be similar to
the way intrusion detection systems
Hi,
Em S?, 2003-08-02 às 16:49, Florin Andrei escreveu:
> How about separating the rules from the SpamAssassin distribution
> itself, and offer them as a separate package? This would be similar to
> the way intrusion detection systems (Snort, etc.) and antivirus
> applications work.
I think thi
Saturday, August 2, 2003, 12:49:08 PM, you wrote:
FA> (I'm not sure if this subject has been discussed before, as i'm not
FA> following the list all the time)
FA> How about separating the rules from the SpamAssassin distribution
FA> itself, and offer them as a separate package? This would be simi
(I'm not sure if this subject has been discussed before, as i'm not
following the list all the time)
How about separating the rules from the SpamAssassin distribution
itself, and offer them as a separate package? This would be similar to
the way intrusion detection systems (Snort, etc.) and antivi
